As you know if you've been reading here lately, I’ve returned to my visual observing roots. The
telescopes I’ve been using most for that have been my two Dobsonians, an 8-inch
f/5 of Konus heritage, and Old Betsy my 12-inch truss tube telescope who was
once, long ago, a Meade StarFinder. Both are good telescopes, but, frankly, the
8-inch is sometimes a little small for my compromised backyard and the 12-inch
a bit of a pain to set up for my less formal observing runs. What about
something in-between, I thought, like a nice 10-inch f/5 Dob?
Since we’ve moved to the suburbs, I’ve pretty successfully
focused on selling/giving away telescopes rather than acquiring more (I still
have an RV-6 I’d like to find a home for locally), so I didn’t feel guilty
about bringing a new one into the house.
Luckily for me, there’s no shortage of bargain 10-inch Dobsonians. Synta
and GSO, the two big Chinese telescope makers, have seen to that. If you want to
keep the price down, both have 10-inchers to tempt you. Synta selling under its own SkyWatcher brand
and to their heretofore main outlet, Orion (Telescope and Binocular Center), where Syntas are sold under that company’s logo in a variety of configurations ranging
from basic manual scopes (what I had in mind), to Orion’s “Intelliscope” DSC
rigs, to full goto and tracking equipped versions.
Then there is GSO, who markets their Dobsonians under the
Zhumell brand and to a few independents like Alabama’s Opticsmart,
who tweak and tune the GSOs as the Apertura Dobs. Oklahoma's Astronomics also occasionally dispenses them under their Astro-Tech brand as well. Normally, however, Zhumell, is distributed by
that Internet sales giant Hayneedle from their telescopes.com outlet (plural,
singular is Orion’s website).
The Apertura Dobs were a natural, I thought, but had a
couple of strikes against them. Opticsmart is in Alabama, so I’d have to pay
sales tax. Also, while I admired the extras of the Aperturas, flocking and
other such niceties, I wanted to keep the price as low as possible.
I liked the white tubes of the Astro-Tech Z10s, and Astronomics is an outfit I've bought from frequently over the last 20 years, but, as is common with their Astro-Tech brand lately, the Dobs were out of stock with the website mentioning a "waiting list," which didn't sound good to impatient me.
I liked the white tubes of the Astro-Tech Z10s, and Astronomics is an outfit I've bought from frequently over the last 20 years, but, as is common with their Astro-Tech brand lately, the Dobs were out of stock with the website mentioning a "waiting list," which didn't sound good to impatient me.
How about Orion? Certainly an OK choice but for two things.
Their cheapest house-brand Synta 10-inch , the XT-10 Classic, is 600 bucks, 100
more than the comparable GSO and also a little plain Jane compared to the Zhumells.
There is no question you get more for your money with the
GSO Dobsonians, beginning with adjustable tension altitude bearings that are
considerably more sophisticated than the XT10’s spring-attached-to-the-bearings-trope balance aid. Said altitude bearings on the GSOs can also be moved forward or
back with reasonable ease to cure most imbalance problems. One thing that may give prospective GSO purchasers pause is the fact that the Dobs use a lazy Susan bearing for azimuth rather than Teflon pads on Formica. More on this shortly.
It’s in the fittings and accessories that the GSO scopes
really pull ahead. The two-speed Crayford of the GSOs is clearly
superior to the single speed unit of the Orion. The Z10 10-inch features a 50mm
RACI finder that’s quite a step up from the Orion’s red dot job. There’s a
battery powered fan to speed cool down with the Zhumell—that’s an extra cost
option on the Orions. There are two eyepieces shipped with the Z10 including a
2-inch 30mm that is not bad as a finding eyepiece I was given to understand (the
Orion comes with a single cheap 25mm Plossl). Oh, and the GSOs even sport laser
collimators.
Another alternative would have been Synta’s series of
collapsible SkyWatcher Dobsonians. While these are rather nice instruments,
they had one thing against them. Prices. 699 for the 10-inch while fair and
all—the scopes are unarguably more attractive and better accessorized than the Orions—was
at the limit of what I wanted to pay. I was also not convinced the collapsible
nature of the scopes would add much value for me. An upper cage assembly that
slides along three truss poles does make the 10-inch more compact, but a 10-inch
f/5 just ain’t that big to begin with.
Synta/SkyWatcher has also introduced a line of traditional,
non collapsible Dobbies. These were just coming on line however, and didn’t
seem widely available. At at any rate, they didn’t seem to have features
that would impel me to choose one over a GSO.
So a Zhumell Z10 it would be. When I’d made my mind up,
there was really no drama involved in ordering. I got on the Telescopes.com
website, turned over my credit card number and I was done. The scope was 499
with free shipping, but I elected to spend a little bit more for FedEx ground
service. The final damage was just a smidge, and only a smidge, over 500.
The most significant thing about my order? The way Hayneedle
just has its act down. I ordered the
10 on Thursday morning and it was on our porch Saturday afternoon. This is the
third item I’ve bought from these people and their service is unparalleled no
matter what you buy, whether a nice mid-century modern clock like the one over our mantelpiece, or the Happy Hand Grenade 100-degree AFOV eyepiece I got from them a couple of years ago.
The only thing I was a little worried about was whether
they’d get the big 10-inch to me in one
piece. There was a hole in the
OTA’s box when it showed up Saturday just before 4 p.m., but the inner carton had not been penetrated and
all was well. With Dorothy’s help, I got the two boxes (one obviously
containing the mount) into the Sunroom, the usual site of my equipment
assembly.
How difficult was the procedure? Not difficult at all if
you’ve assembled Ikea furniture or similar. I did make one mistake with the
front board of the rocker box and had to back up a little at the very end, flipping
the board around so the handle mounted to it was secure. Mostly, the way to
proceed was clear once I downloaded the scope’s manual. Yep, there isn’t one in
the box, you need to download and print a .pdf. There’s also an assembly video which
is really all you need to ensure success.
Actually, there’s not a lot to do nor a lot to go wrong when
assembling the mount. Rocker box sides and front go together with long screws
in pre-drilled holes. Three feet go on the ground board. Rocker box and ground
board go together with a pivot bolt.
There is one thing about the mount you may
or may not like, which I hinted at above. The Synta Dobs still rely on the traditional Teflon and Formica for the
azimuth bearings of the scopes. The GSOs, on the other hand, use large lazy
Susan bearings. How much you will like this arrangement depends on you. I’ve
always preferred super easy azimuth motion, but some folks will not like it. This is both a point in favor of and against the GSOs depending on your perspective, as all their Dobsonians use this
bearing system for azimuth.
Time to get to the good stuff, the big OTA and its accessories. I assembled the tube with the side bearings at their mid
positions (zero on the provided scale) as a starting point. You must remove tube from rocker to adjust the bearing positions, but that isn't a big deal. I then horsed OTA into rocker. Make no
mistake, yes, this is just a 10, but a 10-inch solid tube (steel tube) Dobsonian is not exactly lightweight. Make sure you want to handle one or back off to an 8-incher.
Minor complaint? Like my old friend Pat, I've come to believe after all these years that white is the best color for a telescope tube. Thermally cooperative. Doesn't show fingerprints easily. Looks clean and elegant. Nevertheless, all cats, and even Newtonians, are, like the Z10, black in the dark, so I guess black is OK too.
Minor complaint? Like my old friend Pat, I've come to believe after all these years that white is the best color for a telescope tube. Thermally cooperative. Doesn't show fingerprints easily. Looks clean and elegant. Nevertheless, all cats, and even Newtonians, are, like the Z10, black in the dark, so I guess black is OK too.
Naturally I needed to collimate, to align the optics of this f/5 telescope so it could perform its best. I had heard tales about the
accuracy or lack thereof of the included laser, so decided to leave that for
later, and used my good old Chershire/Sight tube to dial the scope in.
The secondary (adjusted with Phillips head screws, unlike the Synta scopes, which use Allen head screws) needed minor tweaking, which was also all the primary required. The bolts for the primary are serviceable and consist of three knob headed and spring loaded adjustment bolts and three knob-headed locking bolts. Naturally, as with the old push-pull cells, the lock bolts have to be tightened sequentially and by the same amounts or you change the collimation set by the adjustment bolts. I ruled the collimation of the scope very easy. Surprisingly so.
Bob’s Knobs are available for both secondary and primary and I may take advantage of that option depending on how the telescope holds collimation. Stronger springs are another option that Scopestuff and other sell, but I thought the springs worked OK. The primary is center-dotted with a small paper reinforcer, and its position looked OK to me, contrary to what some buyers have reported in the past. I didn't remove the primary cell to check the mirror restraining clips to make sure they are not too tight—another problem some buyers have reported—but the star test didn't reveal signs of that, so they are apparently OK.
The secondary (adjusted with Phillips head screws, unlike the Synta scopes, which use Allen head screws) needed minor tweaking, which was also all the primary required. The bolts for the primary are serviceable and consist of three knob headed and spring loaded adjustment bolts and three knob-headed locking bolts. Naturally, as with the old push-pull cells, the lock bolts have to be tightened sequentially and by the same amounts or you change the collimation set by the adjustment bolts. I ruled the collimation of the scope very easy. Surprisingly so.
Bob’s Knobs are available for both secondary and primary and I may take advantage of that option depending on how the telescope holds collimation. Stronger springs are another option that Scopestuff and other sell, but I thought the springs worked OK. The primary is center-dotted with a small paper reinforcer, and its position looked OK to me, contrary to what some buyers have reported in the past. I didn't remove the primary cell to check the mirror restraining clips to make sure they are not too tight—another problem some buyers have reported—but the star test didn't reveal signs of that, so they are apparently OK.
Once my Z was together and collimated, I spent a little while admiring her. Again, the big deal was how much how little money gets you
these days. I had quite a pile of STUFF—eyepieces, mirror cooling fan battery holder, laser collimator, Moon filter—on the table next to the Z10. However, the only true test of a Dob is under the stars, naturally.
Amazingly it appeared I’d get first light on this first night. The storms that
have been plaguing us had abated. Sometimes I do get lucky.
And lucky I was on this night. The new telescope mostly cooperated. I always expect a commissioning period, a time of getting the kinks out of a new instrument. Usually, my first experience with a new scope is more frustrating than exhilarating. There didn't seem to be too many kinks to get out of the Z10, however. For the most part, it just worked.
There wasn't that much eye candy on display thanks to a large and gibbous Moon, but Jupiter was a spectacle, with the Great Red Spot sharp and clear. Luna was also beautiful as she always is. I scanned around a little for some DSOs, but the mosquitoes were terribly fierce after the rain and the lack of a zero power finder meant I didn't turn up much. Still, I've had more aggravating first lights for far more expensive telescopes.
How about a star test? The seeing sucked despite high humidity, but from what I could tell on Arcturus, the optics are fine and my rather casual approach to collimation was sufficient. Jupiter was probably a better test, anyway. I've observed the King enough over the years to know how he should look in a good 10 - 12-inch scope, and when the seeing settled once in a while, man did he look good. Mucho detail. I also took a gander at Venus, who was her usual mysterious veiled self, but sharp, nevertheless.
There will always be a few problems at first light for any telescope. The Z10's focuser is fine, but my Ethoses wouldn't come to focus without the 1.25-inch adapter that came with the scope. There just wasn't quite enough out travel. A couple of other 2-inch eyepieces were on the hairy edge, too. Not unusual for a store-bought Newtonian, but a little trying. I hate having to pull an eyepiece out for it to focus. I will collimate again this morning, pulling the primary as far back as possible. If the 13 and 8 Es still won't come to focus without the adapter, I'll buy a 2-inch extension tube for the focuser, I suppose. Otherwise, the focuser's action and the 2-speed feature worked well--very well indeed. This is a long way from the Chinese rack and pinion focusers of yore, y'all.
I was happy with the azimuth motion once I cranked down the knob on the pivot bolt. Some of you would still think it is too easy, however. Me? One of the things I hated about Old Besty when she was in her StarFinder body was the dadgummed too stiff altitude motion. I've seen the same on many import Dobs. I much prefer the lazy Susan. I was even more impressed by the altitude setup. With sufficient tension on the knobs on both bearings, any eyepiece I tried balanced with the scope. This is mucho bettero than springs or beanbags or welding magnet-weights, folks.
Biggest impediment on this evening, however, was the lack of an easy-to-use finder. I've got a Rigel Quickfinder mounting base on order. A 50mm finder, even a RACI finder, is difficult for me to use, heavy moonlight or not. I need that zero-power reticle floating before the stars I can see with my naked eye, not the confusing groups of suns revealed in an optical finder. Most of you will likewise want a Telrad or Quickfinder base.
And lucky I was on this night. The new telescope mostly cooperated. I always expect a commissioning period, a time of getting the kinks out of a new instrument. Usually, my first experience with a new scope is more frustrating than exhilarating. There didn't seem to be too many kinks to get out of the Z10, however. For the most part, it just worked.
There wasn't that much eye candy on display thanks to a large and gibbous Moon, but Jupiter was a spectacle, with the Great Red Spot sharp and clear. Luna was also beautiful as she always is. I scanned around a little for some DSOs, but the mosquitoes were terribly fierce after the rain and the lack of a zero power finder meant I didn't turn up much. Still, I've had more aggravating first lights for far more expensive telescopes.
How about a star test? The seeing sucked despite high humidity, but from what I could tell on Arcturus, the optics are fine and my rather casual approach to collimation was sufficient. Jupiter was probably a better test, anyway. I've observed the King enough over the years to know how he should look in a good 10 - 12-inch scope, and when the seeing settled once in a while, man did he look good. Mucho detail. I also took a gander at Venus, who was her usual mysterious veiled self, but sharp, nevertheless.
There will always be a few problems at first light for any telescope. The Z10's focuser is fine, but my Ethoses wouldn't come to focus without the 1.25-inch adapter that came with the scope. There just wasn't quite enough out travel. A couple of other 2-inch eyepieces were on the hairy edge, too. Not unusual for a store-bought Newtonian, but a little trying. I hate having to pull an eyepiece out for it to focus. I will collimate again this morning, pulling the primary as far back as possible. If the 13 and 8 Es still won't come to focus without the adapter, I'll buy a 2-inch extension tube for the focuser, I suppose. Otherwise, the focuser's action and the 2-speed feature worked well--very well indeed. This is a long way from the Chinese rack and pinion focusers of yore, y'all.
I was happy with the azimuth motion once I cranked down the knob on the pivot bolt. Some of you would still think it is too easy, however. Me? One of the things I hated about Old Besty when she was in her StarFinder body was the dadgummed too stiff altitude motion. I've seen the same on many import Dobs. I much prefer the lazy Susan. I was even more impressed by the altitude setup. With sufficient tension on the knobs on both bearings, any eyepiece I tried balanced with the scope. This is mucho bettero than springs or beanbags or welding magnet-weights, folks.
Biggest impediment on this evening, however, was the lack of an easy-to-use finder. I've got a Rigel Quickfinder mounting base on order. A 50mm finder, even a RACI finder, is difficult for me to use, heavy moonlight or not. I need that zero-power reticle floating before the stars I can see with my naked eye, not the confusing groups of suns revealed in an optical finder. Most of you will likewise want a Telrad or Quickfinder base.
Anyhoo, one more mosquito bite and I'd reached my infamous I Have Had Enough stage, covered Z with one of my Desert Storm covers, and headed for the Den where I turned on Netflix and ended my evening in appropriate fashion with Season One of the History Channel's Universe.
2018 Update
What has changed and what hasn't changed in the intervening three and a half years since the telescope who became known as "Zelda" came to live with me?
When it comes to the Synta and GSO telescopes themselves, not much. The models I mentioned here are all still current. Different accessory lineups come and go, but even those have remained much the same. What has changed is where you can buy a 10-inch GSO Dobbie, and how much any of the 10-inchers in this class are gonna cost you.
First things first, Hayneedle sold its telescopes.com website/business. That continued on for a while, but is now either gone or mutated into a website called "Telescopes Plus" (typing "telescopes.com" takes you to Orion). Honestly, I don't know the complete story, and trying to keep up with the affairs of Chinese telescope sellers is, yes, like herding cats.
2018 Update
What has changed and what hasn't changed in the intervening three and a half years since the telescope who became known as "Zelda" came to live with me?
When it comes to the Synta and GSO telescopes themselves, not much. The models I mentioned here are all still current. Different accessory lineups come and go, but even those have remained much the same. What has changed is where you can buy a 10-inch GSO Dobbie, and how much any of the 10-inchers in this class are gonna cost you.
First things first, Hayneedle sold its telescopes.com website/business. That continued on for a while, but is now either gone or mutated into a website called "Telescopes Plus" (typing "telescopes.com" takes you to Orion). Honestly, I don't know the complete story, and trying to keep up with the affairs of Chinese telescope sellers is, yes, like herding cats.
Suffice to say, however, Telescopes Plus are selling both the GSO 10-inch Dobs under both the Zhumell and Apertura labels. Unlike before, however, the Aperturas (I have no idea whether they are still sourced from the Alabama folks) apparently don't offer any of the mods that originally brought them to my attention. They seem to be exactly the same as the Zhumell-branded scopes now. Beyond that, I know nothing of Telescopes Plus. If I do learn more, I will clue you in.
As for the Synta bunch, whether SkyWatcher or Orion branded, the 10-inchers are also pretty much the same as they were when I wrote this in the late spring of 2015.
What has changed? How much you will pay whether you buy GSO or Synta. Oh, I know the miniscule amount I spent, $499.00, was plain crazy, but it's still somewhat disturbing how much the fare has risen. While I haven't visited every website nor checked for sales at Orion, it appears that at this time a basic no-tracking/no-goto/no-DSC 10-inch will set you back about 600 bucks--and unlike when I got Zelda from Hayneedle, you'll probably pay a fair amount for shipping. This is still a heck of a deal for a 10-inch telescope, of course. Why the increases? Well, when I bought, the price for a telescope of this aperture and generously equipped with accessories seemed artificially low. I also wonder if the tariff foolishness has had an effect.
And it's not all gloom and doom either. While the basic scopes have gone up in price, it appears SkyWatcher has held the line on its fancier models. The collapsible tube 10-inch, for example, is still at 699, making it a more attractive possibility then when I bought Zelda. Back then it was almost 200 more than the basic GSO 10er. Today, Telescopes Plus charges 699 for the exact same scope and accessories I got.
How about my Zhumell, good old Zelda? She is keeping on keeping on, just like me. I will admit I haven't used her that much over the last year, but with the coming of fall, improved weather and (probably) me starting on a new visual deep sky observing book, I believe that will change.
As for the Synta bunch, whether SkyWatcher or Orion branded, the 10-inchers are also pretty much the same as they were when I wrote this in the late spring of 2015.
What has changed? How much you will pay whether you buy GSO or Synta. Oh, I know the miniscule amount I spent, $499.00, was plain crazy, but it's still somewhat disturbing how much the fare has risen. While I haven't visited every website nor checked for sales at Orion, it appears that at this time a basic no-tracking/no-goto/no-DSC 10-inch will set you back about 600 bucks--and unlike when I got Zelda from Hayneedle, you'll probably pay a fair amount for shipping. This is still a heck of a deal for a 10-inch telescope, of course. Why the increases? Well, when I bought, the price for a telescope of this aperture and generously equipped with accessories seemed artificially low. I also wonder if the tariff foolishness has had an effect.
And it's not all gloom and doom either. While the basic scopes have gone up in price, it appears SkyWatcher has held the line on its fancier models. The collapsible tube 10-inch, for example, is still at 699, making it a more attractive possibility then when I bought Zelda. Back then it was almost 200 more than the basic GSO 10er. Today, Telescopes Plus charges 699 for the exact same scope and accessories I got.
How about my Zhumell, good old Zelda? She is keeping on keeping on, just like me. I will admit I haven't used her that much over the last year, but with the coming of fall, improved weather and (probably) me starting on a new visual deep sky observing book, I believe that will change.
I agree Rod that a 10" is a sweet spot - not too big, not too small. Globulars really come alive at that aperture. The best view I have had of M31 has been with a 10".....Dwight
ReplyDeleteExcellent article, Rod. I have a GSO 8" here in New Zealand, as you say they are a lot of 'scope for the money!
ReplyDeleteHey Uncle Rod,
ReplyDeleteI have a 2" University Optics 20 mm eyepiece I use with my Meade 12" Light bridge. I found that a 2" PVC coupling worked great as a spacer.
Dewey Barker
Rod, I have had my Z10 for about 3 years now. I decided on it for mainy of the same reasons you listed here. It has made a nice companion to my C8 on those times when I just want to observe without all the tech hassles. Enjoy.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to hear your views on the 10" GSO versus your C8. I had both at one point and chose the C8 over the 10" due to portability, and also how close the 8" was in brightness and resolution to the 10".
ReplyDeleteThank you for this timely and informative post. I am trying to make a decision on my first telescope purchase; the only scope I've used is my inherited ETX-90 that I've had for nearly 15 years. From what's available right now, the Zhumell Dobs seem like a no-brainer from a value proposition. The main decision now is 8" or 10". Cost is swaying me towards the 8", but aperture fever compels me towards the 10". And I am trying to convince myself that the larger dob would not be an issue considering I'm in my 30's, healthy, and have only a few steps to contend with to get the scope to my backyard. But my only telescope experience being with the light and portable ETX makes me nervous about the larger instrument. I'm also keeping my eyes peeled on the second hand market since I have a tight budget to work with, but I'm the kind of person who prefers to buy new so I know how my stuff has been treated during its lifetime. But buying new probably means that I'm stuck with the supplied accessories for a while, in addition to the 8mm TV plossl and 1.25" ES focal extender that I have for my ETX-90. I would really appreciate any advice you might have to offer. -Ryan
ReplyDeleteHi. what are the dimensions for the two boxes it came in? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThe boxes have long since gone to the curb. The long box with the OTA inside was slightly longer than the tube itself...maybe about 57-inches or so. You may be able to get an idea from the video...
ReplyDeleteRyan, if you can afford it and move it about you may as well get the 10".
ReplyDeleteOne thing, I have not taken mine on any road trips yet. It is going to be close fitting it into either my MarkVIII or my Aurora. If it doesn't fit I'll have to use the wife's van!
I got mine second-hand. After a few years the stock primary support springs go soft, so it's either: 1) keep the lock screws snug, or 2) replace the springs.
ReplyDeleteOther than that, this scope has been a GREAT performer.
The Zhumell z12 was my first adult scope... It was dirt cheap five years ago... I added a Opticsmart HALO setting circle kit(discontinued) right away and it was off to the races. No regrets. Hayneedle customer service was on the mark for accessory purchases too.
ReplyDeleteFarpoint astro makes straps for the z10. Makes it much easier to deal with
ReplyDelete