Sunday, November 23, 2014
Amateur Astronomy the Old Fashioned Way with Shelley and Me
“The best telescope is the one that gets used the most.” “The older I get, the lazier I get.” Ain’t both of those things the freaking truth, and especially the latter, muchachos? As Gaia has rolled around ol’ Sol yet another time, I’ve found myself increasingly less likely or willing to set up my 12-inch Dobsonian or even my 8-inch SCT for a quick backyard gander at the Moon—or anything else.
Something else that has increased as the years pass is my nostalgia for the things of my youth—or the things I wish I’d had as a youth. Like those luscious Unitron refractors of yore with their long, gleaming white tubes. You can’t go home again; the stream of time flows on carrying the past out of reach. Sometimes, however, you can unexpectedly get a taste, a whiff of that past. Which happened to me via an unexpected gift.
As you learned here a few weeks back, I received a semi-vintage and somewhat spiffed up Celestron C102 from my old friend Pat Rochford some months ago. Not long after we moved into the New Manse in May. A C102 ain’t a Unitron. But it is at least in the spirit of those icons of refractordom, which your old Uncle, like every other space-smitten little kid dreamed of owning in 1965 but could never afford.
“A Celestron refractor, Unk? I thought Celestron was all about SCTs.” Not at all, Skeezix, not at all. Celestron’s C102 goes all the way back to the early 1980s. In them days, Celestron was selling considerable Vixen gear. That Japanese manufacturer was highly regarded by amateur astronomers of the time, and Celestron had begun selling Vixen’s Super Polaris mount with one of its C8 models. Before long, the company expanded their Vixen offerings to include a couple of that company’s Newtonian reflectors and several refractors including a 4-inch achromat, the C102.
Despite the 1980s being the age of Dobsonians and SCTs, the C102 was highly regarded. While it was an achromat and suffered from excess color—purple halos, that is—on brighter objects, its reasonably long (by today’s standards) focal ratio of f/10 kept that to bearable levels. The only fly buzzin’ in the C102 ointment was that the Vixen Super Polaris mount, which was more than sufficient for the C8, was stressed by the long tube of the 4-inch refractor.
It took a while for Celestron to rectify that shortcoming, but rectify it they did in the early 90s when they began selling the C102 on Vixen’s improved medium German equatorial, the Great Polaris, which is the ancestor of all the Chinese “GP clones” with us today including Celestron’s CG5s and VXes. The mount, while not overkill, was more than sufficient for the C102.
“And the C102 lived happily ever after, continuing to meet the wants and needs of decades of achromatic refractor fans.” Not exactly. By the mid-90s the bloom was off the Vixen rose for Celestron. Prices for the Japanese maker’s gear were climbing at the same time the Mainland Chinese company Synta was coming on strong. In 1998, Celestron replaced the Vixen Great Polaris, both for the C102 and for its GEM-mounted C8, with the ubiquitous Synta EQ-4, which Celestron dubbed the “CG5.” They didn’t stop there. Henceforth, Synta would also make the refractor’s tube assembly.
Was this new C102 an improvement? No. It was a cost saving measure, and there was good and bad in the new model (which looked almost identical to the GP-C102). The good was that, almost unbelievably for those of us who’d thus far looked askance at Chinese refractors, the optics in the Synta-made C102 were virtually indistinguishable from those in the Vixen. The OTA itself? The focuser was no great shakes, but it was an OK rack and pinion. The dirty little secret? The Vixen focusers weren’t so hot, either.
The mount was a different story. The early manual CG5s have little to do with the latter day goto CG5 so beloved of cost-conscious amateur astronomers. The wooden tripod was history, replaced with an extruded aluminum job just this side of flimsy. What little smoothness there was in the declination and right ascension axes was attributable to the infamous Chinese glue-grease, which was applied in large dollops. The mount was workable for the new C102, but just barely.
Nevertheless, thanks to its consistent optical quality, the C102 OTA just kept on trucking year after year, hopping on different mounts as time passed and occasionally undergoing minor styling revisions, but staying good, very good. Whether on one of the NexStar goto mounts, or, as today, on Celestron’s non-goto CG4, “C102” spells “Celestron” every bit as much as “C8” does. One nice change to the Chinese C102 a few years after its introduction was that the original 1.25-inch rack and pinion was replaced by a 2-inch job.
Want a C102 today? Celestron’s CG4 – C102 combo is nicely priced at $499.95—the scope is not over-mounted on the CG4 GEM, but the mount is sufficient for it. What’s truly amazing, however, are the periodic C102 OTA sales you can find, especially from OPT, Oceanside Photo and Telescope in Cally-for-nye-ay. Right now, you can get an OTA for 170 dineros, and last year they were selling the scopes for the astounding price of 50 bucks. At any of the above prices, the C102 is an incredible buy.
Not that your old Uncle necessarily believed that when Pat dropped the C102 off at the New Manse. Oh, I remembered how Mr. Pat had raved about another 102 he’d owned years ago, how it literally tore up the dark night sky at the Chiefland Astronomy Village one cold winter night in 2001 (the year the Winter Star Party was canceled and many WSP refugees wound up at the CAV). Still, I wasn’t quite convinced. An achromat, a 4-inch at f/10?
To get the cursed color purple down low on a 4-inch, you have to go to f/15 or f/16, like those long, long Unitrons. On the other hand, I recalled having had a hell of a lot of fun with my old Short Tube 80, Woodstock (who has since gone to live with Unk’s son, Chris), and that 80mm f/5 certainly wasn’t lacking in chromatic aberration.
The bottom line on excess color? It bothers some people more than others. Me? I am not overly troubled by it, whether it’s around bright stars or turning lunar shadows a deep purple instead of inky black. The question would not be whether it would disturb me, but how much—if any—sharpness it would steal from the C102’s images. That is the real problem with chromatic aberration. At high levels, it blurs the image. Howsomeever, I well remembered one cold night in 1999 when I watched a triple shadow transit on Jupiter with Woodstock. I was amazed at how sharp the planet was. So, I was willing to give the C102 a tryout.
What with all that was involved in getting settled in the New Chaos Manor South, it took some time for me to get around to giving Miss Shelley a tryout. “Shelley?” I don’t name my telescopes, y’all. Oh, they all have names, but I don’t give them names, they tell me their names, eventually. It took a while but my C102 finally whispered that she is to be called “Shelley.”
Anyhoo, what prompted me to give Shelley a go was that I had come to favor refractors for my quick backyard observing. I can waltz one out of the sunroom and onto the deck in 15-seconds flat. Not that Shelley didn’t have competition there. My 80mm APO does a fantastic job on everything in that role, and Miss Dorothy’s Explore Scientific AR102 does too, and with a little more aperture. Unk got to thinking, however, that it might be nice to have a little more aperture to play with than with the APO and a little less color than presented by Miss D’s f/6.5 telescope.
The results? You can read all about it at the link above, but for visual, Shelley takes the laurels. But not by much. While the C102 threw up a dadgum impressive star test, the 80mm APO, Veronica, does too, and despite her smaller aperture doesn’t fall far behind in visual performance. If she does at all. There’s more to a scope than just performance, though; there was something about the C102’s long tube towering above me. It was if at least some of those daydreams I dreamed while mooning over the old Unitron catalog as a sprout were finally coming true. Color? There’s purple, but it is bearable.
I did quite a bit of touring of the bright deep sky objects with the C102 on the moonless nights that followed, but there’s only so many times you can look at M2, M13, M92, and the rest of the showpiece gang before getting a mite bored. Oh, the summer and fall Messiers were as beautiful this autumn, my 50th autumn observing them, as they ever were, but no matter how pretty they looked in my “new” telescope, I wanted some variety in the backyard. What else could I do with Shelley? What would she be good at?
One afternoon I was shelving some books that had come over from the old Chaos Manor South in a box, and ran across a real blast from the past, Herbert Bernhard, Dorothy Bennett, and Hugh Rice’s New Handbook of the Heavens (1954). It was one of my favorites in the hallowed day, not only because of its clear prose and the observing lists at the ends of its chapters, but because it had come in the box with my Palomar Junior. Surely if Edmund Scientific included the book with their scopes, it must be a dang good one.
The New Handbook is actually a follow-on to the original Handbook of the Heavens (1935), but while it is an update, there is no question it is still about the old amateur astronomy. An amateur astronomy where the deep sky took a decided backseat to other pursuits.
Take a look at the Handbook’s table of contents and you’ll find you have to scan down almost to the bottom to come to the “Star Clusters and Nebulae” chapter. The authors do do a good job describing what there is to see of the deep sky with a small telescope, and at the end of the chapter, there’s an outstanding list of 60 of the best of the best DSOs for little scopes. Most of the Handbook’s space is devoted to the things most amateurs of 1950s - 1960s observed more often than even the bright Messiers, however. The emphasis in the book is on the Moon, the planets, and double and variable stars.
Why did amateur astronomers tend to restrict themselves to those subjects when a mere 4-inch refractor or a 6-inch reflector will do one heck of a job on the deep sky? Because most amateurs, even in the 1960s, didn’t have a 4-inch refractor or a 6-inch reflector, with the refractor being a particularly tough nut to crack for most of us. Edmund Scientific’s reasonably priced 4-inch refractor, for example, was $247.00 (their 6-inch Newtonian was 50 bucks less). Depending on how you calculate such things, that is equivalent to at least $1370.00 today. A high-toned refractor like a Unitron? Don’t even ask, Bubba, don’t even ask.
Because of the way-out prices for store-bought scopes, amateurs in the 1960s, and not just kids, often made do with 2.4-inch refractors and 3-inch reflectors. Yeah, you’d think from what the old timers down to the club say that everybody back then was grinding and polishing 6-inch mirrors, but that was most assuredly not the case. Then as now, most of us, and especially us sprouts, were amateur telescope buyers, not amateur telescope makers. Accordingly, astronomy authors tended to restrict themselves to objects within range of our small scopes: double stars, the planets, the Moon, and the brightest deep sky wonders.
Its focus on the bright stuff made the New Handbook of the Heavens, Unk thought, just about the perfect guide to what I would enjoy with my 4-inch lens-scope from my light polluted backyard (limiting magnitude at the zenith not much better than 5 on a good night). There was also just something romantic about pursuing the old amateur astronomy, the amateur astronomy of Patrick Moore in his heyday, with a long-tubed refractor on chilly (well, for down here) fall nights. I’d already done a quick survey of bright DSOs; it was now double star time.
I’ve never been the world’s most committed double star observer. I’ve blown hot and cold on binaries and multiple stars over the last half century. Obviously, my contributions to and support of The Journal of Double Star Observations are signs that these stars are an important interest of mine; I’m just a-saying you shouldn’t imagine I go pair-hunting every dadgum night. I still and always will love doubles, however, and was happy to have an excuse to look at the best of the best with Shelley.
Before I could do that, howsomeever, I needed to rectify the finder stichy-ation. As Mr. Pat delivered Miss Shelley, she was equipped with a pretty but too small 30mm finder. I immediately replaced that with a red dot job, which, even in our gray skies, was sufficient for locating the brightest Messiers. To run down medium bright doubles, though, much less dimmer ones? Uh-uh. Luckily I had a 50mm Orion RACI finder sitting unloved in my shop. It was in a Synta mount and would slide right onto Shelley. I am not a huge fan of right angle finders, correct image or no, but I figgered the RACI would at least be superior to the alternatives.
So it was that I began a survey of Double Star Gooduns on a chilly (40s, y’all) November evening. The sky wasn’t perfect; haze was moving in ahead of a front and one look at Vega showed the seeing was at least semi-punk. But I’d been down in the dumps—for no good reason, really—all afternoon and figgered an hour or two under the stars would help, even if conditions weren’t all they ort-ta be. While I used the New Handbook as a general guide to what would be fun look at, I didn’t try to decipher its small text under a red light. Instead, I loaded up the Astronomical League Double Star List on SkyTools 3 on my Toshiba laptop.
One of the loveliest things about a refractor? Just a few minutes acclimating to outdoor temperatures on this cool night and one is ready to rock. I’d mastered the fine art of moving Shelley from the sunroom where she lives out onto the deck without removing her big tube from her SkyWatcher AZ-4 alt-azimuth mount, and in five minutes I was ready to start looking and she was ready for me to start looking…
Beta Cygni, Albireo
“Two tiny points of light—one rich orange, the other a deep blue—placed close together in the telescopic field—such is the appearance of Albireo…the concealed beauties of many similar stellar objects lie unsuspected until discovered in the telescope.” So says the vaunted New Handbook, and I agree—do I ever. I love Albireo, the blue and gold “Cub Scout Double,” though I don’t look at it often. I mostly just show it off on public outreach nights, taking a quick glance at it to make sure it’s centered and focused.
On this night, I spent a little time with Beta Cygni. At my finding power, 67x, with the 16mm 100-degree AFOV Happy Hand Grenade eyepiece, the view was scrumptious, and not just because of the deep and vibrant colors as described in the Handbook. What made Albireo doubly outstanding was the tiny perfect appearance stars tend to assume in a good refractor. I stared for at least 15-minutes despite being hunched over at the eyepiece—even at full extension, the AZ-4 tripod is not really tall enough for a 4-inch f/10.
Alpha Ursae Minoris, Polaris
As is often the case when I’m chasing double stars, Polaris was one of the first pairs of the evening. It’s a good test of conditions. As usual, it was easy but not that easy. The secondary was visible, but I did have to look for it in the seeing, which was definitely tending to “poor.” It soon showed itself as a little white spark beside the strongly yellowish primary. Since the separation between the two is 18.4”, you’d think resolving Polaris would be like shooting dadgum fish in a barrel, but it is not so. I could see the comes with the 16mm eyepiece, but I needed the 7mm to make it really stand out. Polaris is tough because of the difference in magnitudes between its primary and secondary which are, respectively, at magnitudes 2.0 and 9.1.
Epsilon 1 and 2 Lyrae, the Double Double
Since I was in the area, figgered I might as well check in on the famous Double Double, Epsilon 1 and 2 Lyare. Epsilon 1 is at magnitude 4.7 and Epsilon 2 at magnitude 5.1 and they are separated by a huge 208”, hardly a challenge—the split was trivially easy in the 50mm finder. That ain’t the challenge, though, the challenge is that each of these two stars is itself a close double.
Epsilon 1 Lyrae is composed of a magnitude 4.7 primary and magnitude 6.2 secondary separated by 2.6”. Not usually a problem for medium aperture scopes at medium magnifications on nights of good seeing, but more than close enough when, as on this evening, the air doesn’t want to hold still. Epsilon 2 is a magnitude 5.1 and 5.5 pair, and is a wee bit closer together at 2.3”. Again, not a huge challenge, but enough of a challenge when the seeing sucks. What helps is that both pairs’ stars are fairly close to each other in magnitude.
Anyhow, despite the relatively lousy atmospheric conditions, Epsilon 1 and Epsilon 2 were split at 143x in Shelley with my 7mm William Optics Uwan eyepiece. I could see that the stars were elongated at 67x, but only barely. Only when the seeing would change and they’d briefly stop shimmering and dancing around.
Gamma 1 Andromedae, Almaak
Almaak is another one of the very best doubles. The “end” star in Andromeda’s eastern chain of stars is a nice, easy split at 9.0”, which also puts the primary and the companion close enough together that the pair really looks like a double star at medium powers. The primary is a beautiful deep golden color and shines brightly at magnitude 2.0. It is made even more lovely by the contrast provided by the secondary, which stands out well at magnitude 5.0 and has a light blue-green tint.
Despite Almaak being over the house and in the extra poor seeing caused by heat rising from the roof, Shelley did a fine job. At 67X I coulda drove a truck between primary and secondary. Other observations? Mainly that the secondary star looked bluer to me than it does in my SCTs. Whether that is due to the smaller aperture of the refractor, or to the fact that it is a refractor, I don’t know, but the difference was noticeable.
Eta Persei, Miram
Miram is a famous double star, but not one that’s really a showpiece in this old boy’s opinion. The separation, 28.9”, makes it an easy but relatively wide one, and at magnitude 7.9, the secondary star seems somewhat lackluster. The mag 3.8 primary was easy to spot, even in the eastern horizon light dome from consarned Airport Boulevard, and is an obvious deep gold-orange. The secondary? From the first glance, the secondary seemed a pale blue. Not the “very blue” the Handbook claims, but blue, not white as it’s appeared in my C8.
Since I was in the neighborhood, I bopped over to the west to have a look at the Double Cluster, just a little less than four and a half degrees away. Despite still being in the heavy light pollution and in increasing haze, the two companion open clusters were wondrously beautiful in the Happy Hand Grenade. There is just no way to make ‘em look bad, y’all. But, as I watched, they began to do a fade out. The occasional bands of thick haze were morphing into genuine clouds and it was time to throw the Big Switch.
Throwing that Big Switch took all of maybe two minutes. Objective cap on the scope, pick her up, and back into the house we went in nuttin’ flat. Grabbed the eyepieces off the patio table and we was done. I didn’t have to pack up the Toshiba, since I’d set up the laptop in the sunroom so I could duck inside and warm my old bones when scoping out the next target star with SkyTools.
Yeah, double stars were great in the refractor, muchachos, but that is hardly all she can do. In addition to a surprisingly good job on the deep sky, she has made a believer out of me when it comes to the Moon, and I originally intended to clue y’all in as to how Luna looked in the achromat. Unfortunately, I see it is time for me and Shelley to run along before we wear out our welcome this Sunday morning. You will hear more about our adventures soon, and not just on the Moon, but on the planets—King Jupe is on his way back into the evening sky, and I am curious what my new friend of a telescope will accomplish there.
Next Time: Unk's Astroware Top 10…
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Being a Joiner
What is something your garrulous old Uncle hasn't talked about in quite a spell, muchachos? Astronomy clubs. As those of y’all who've been here a while know, Unk is a big supporter of organized amateur astronomy. What you sprouts raised in the Internet age may not know, however, is there are still mucho reasons for you to belong to a non-virtual club.
“But Unk, but Unk, the Cloudy Nights BBS (or Astromart or the Astronomy Forums or Ice in Space) is just like belonging to a club, a club with thousands of members. One whose meeting is in session 24/7. Why would I want to jine-up with that astro-club that meets in the smelly old backroom of Wally’s Filling Station?” Well, Skeezix, maybe the place to start in cluing you in as to the reasons for holding your nose and heading down to Wally’s is to give a quick rundown of my five decades of experience with clubs.
Looking back, I reckon I’ve been a member of…oh…four-five astronomy clubs in my five decades of observing. That began with my first club, which we members didn’t think was a real astronomy club at all, but was—was it ever. I’m talking about the legendary Backyard Astronomy Society formed by Unk and a few of his nerdy buddies in our junior high years.
We BASers occasionally had delusions of grandeur, like the time we talked about mailing that holy of holies, Sky & Telescope, a detailed report on our activities for use in the old “Amateur Astronomers” column. We also planned to send in a blurb to the newspaper, The Possum Swamp Register and Birdcage Liner, making our presence and meeting schedule known to the community at large. Soon we’d have a hundred members. Then we’d be a real club.
We never quite got up the gumption to do either of those things, or even post a flier at the public library. What we did do was get together, mostly in the summertime, but on weekends throughout the school year, too, to observe from members’ backyards and vacant lots or just hang out and talk astronomy and analyze the latest issue of Sky & Telescope (and maybe the latest issue of the Fantastic Four’s comic magazine, too). Our star parties were somewhat constrained by the need to enlist our mamas and daddies for transport duty. Purty dern hard to tote a Palomar Junior around on a bicycle. Nevertheless, we did a lot of observing over the four years the BAS was active.
Me and my good buddies Wayne Lee and Lamar formed the core group, which occasionally expanded to seven or eight “astronomers.” That was purty much the height, and as tenth grade began, the BAS star parties became fewer and farther between as our ranks shrunk as parents moved away in the wake of Brookley Air Force Base’s closure. There was also considerable natural attrition as girls and cars began to work their way into the consciousnesses of even us nerds. Till that happened, though, what fun we had!
Assembled in somebody’s backyard, we would usually have at least four scopes cranking. My Pal Junior was the aperture king till Lamar and his daddy fabricated their very own 6-inch from a mirror kit they ordered from Jaegers. At first I was miffed at not having the big gun anymore, but I got over that. I could now observe with a six-inch reflector regularly, and toward the end of the BAS’ existence, Lamar and his old man even showed me the ropes of mirror making.
It didn’t matter if we were observing with the Pal and the Big Six, or just a couple of 60mm refractors and Unk’s old 3-inch Tasco Newt, which was what I had when the BAS began. What mattered was that we were observing together and that was more fun and more productive than observing alone.
Group observing was more productive for me not just because I didn’t have to fear the depredations of the dadgum Wolfman and the UFOnauts when I was with my friends. It was because we helped each other. Like the night I went after the doggone Blinking Planetary in Cygnus for the first time. The books said it was bright and obvious, but danged if I could find it. If I had been by myself, I’d just have given up and moved on. But Wayne Lee had looked at it before and showed me how to track it down. Our individual skills and knowledge might have been pitiful, but by working together we saw a hell of a lot and learned a hell of a lot.
And so it went till the good ol’ BAS slowly faded out of existence. It was maybe the greatest astronomy club I ever belonged to, just like maybe the Palomar Junior was maybe the greatest telescope I ever owned. I’ve had “better” scopes and been a member of “better” clubs over the intervening five decades, but nothing has ever quite equaled those long ago summer nights in the backyard with my Pal and my pals.
After the BAS dissolved completely, probably late in our junior year of high school, Unk was clubless for a long time. I pushed on observing, of course, but I missed having somebody to talk shop with astronomy-wise. Most of all, I missed observing with my friends. Alas, there was no astronomy club at either of the universities I attended.
I didn’t join my first (adult) club till the mid 1970s when I was in the Air Force and stationed in Little Rock, Arkansas. There was a vibrant club there, and after a while, it was near about as much fun as the BAS. Several moves and a couple more clubs later, I wound up with the vaunted Possum Swamp Astronomical Society, whose ranks I’ve been part of for over twenty years.
Whether the BAS or the PSAS, the joys of and motivations for club membership have always been the same for me: camaraderie and the sharing of knowledge and skills. And, in the average adult club, there are some pluses that go beyond even those things.
One biggie for many boys and girls is that just about every astronomy club worth its salt has a dark site for group observing. In the BAS years, that wasn't important. Even if we’d had a dark site and a way to get to and from it, we didn’t need it. Our suburban skies were almost as good as the average suburban-country transition zone club site today. But with the growth of all them subdivisions and shopping malls from the 60s till now, today most of us need something better than the backyard for our serious work.
If you have a nice little piece of land out in the dark countryside, bully for you. Few of us do. What makes a club important here is that it is way easier to find a dark site as a group. With a sizable membership, it’s likely somebody knows somebody with dark country land. It’s also easier to get permission to use a site as an organized group than as an individual—unless you have a close friend with a country place, which, again, most of us don’t. Observing as a group at a dark site is also good for security's sake. Not because of the Mothman or the Skunk Ape (necessarily), but because of the very real presence of bad guys in the hinterlands due to the meth trade.
Another reason to belong to a club, and an important one these days, is that it gives you an organization and sometimes a venue for doing public outreach. Yeah, I know that isn't everybody’s cup of tea, but most of us realize the importance of bringing new folks into our slightly graying avocation. NO, I don’t think amateur astronomy is doomed to disappear as us Baby Boomers do the big chill, but there is no question it’s a Good Thing to bring new folks into the hobby. Not just kids, but groups that have traditionally been under-served by us—women and minorities.
Just as when searching for a dark site, outreach is easier to do in the context of an organized group. The schools, for example, might be happy enough to have the help of a lone amateur, but a group of ten, twenty, or more amateur astronomers will be better. A single amateur can make a difference, but a group, showing the sky to a hundred or a thousand kids and parents will make a bigger difference.
Finally, there is that comradery factor. Yeah, it is cool to be able to log onto Astromart and participate in the forums, but I believe it is still more fun to interact with your fellow amateurs in person. And if you need help, a non-virtual club is a better way to get it. Folks can have Newtonian collimation, for example, explained to them a million times on the dadgum Cloudy Nights and still not get it, but will learn it easily from one hands-on session down to the club.
There are also the ineffables, the things not strictly related to the astronomy club that nevertheless enhance your amateur astronomy experience. A couple of clubs I’ve belonged to and visited have held a Meeting after the Meeting. Once the formalities wind up, you and your mates adjourn to the nearby bar or—maybe even better—one of the family-oriented grills and bars like Applebee’s or TGI Friday’s to have some drinks and snacks and talk astronomy and who-knows-what-else for a couple of hours. To tell you the truth, some of my best observing ideas have come out of these ale-fueled bull sessions.
Possibly the best thing about belonging to a club, though? Again, you make friends, friends with the same magnificent obsession for the Great Out There you have. Sometimes, lifelong friends. After a couple of meetings, you’ll find yourself giving one of your fellow club members a ring to ask about that new eyepiece. Your conversations will soon range farther afield, beyond amateur astronomy, and you’ll start spending time with your friend outside meetings. I know that this one thing has made astronomy club membership, which has its headaches as well as joys, one of the best parts of my life.
Yes, there are headaches. Like anything else, life in an astronomy club is not perfect. To start with, every club I’ve belonged to has had a member or three of the “off the beaten path” persuasion. These are the people who attend every single meeting without fail, but never observe and will never own a telescope. Many of them also have an odd take on the science of astronomy, like a former PSAS member, Junie Moon, who went a couple of years before she determined we were not actually an ASTROLOGY club, “Them dadgum people never would tell me my horoscope!”
I used to wonder why people who had no interest in practicing astronomy would go to astronomy club meetings month after month after month. In fact, it used to bother the heck out of me. No more. I finally realized an astronomy club is serving some kind of need for these people, and that they are indeed practicing and enjoying our avocation in their own way. They sometimes make me scratch my head, but they don’t bother me anymore.
In fact, some of these “armchair astronomers,” if we may call them that, can be real assets. Linda Sue will never be found lugging a scope onto a dark observing field, even if she happens to own one. She can’t help you with picking a new eyepiece, either. But she has a talent for organization and can get the club’s Christmas banquet on the rails right away. Cousin Ezra over there believes Immanuel Velikovsky was 100% correct about them colliding worlds, but he is also a skilled machinist who can make a no-longer-produced part for your telescope mount in a right quick hurry. And so it goes. Don’t underestimate someone’s worth to your club just because they haven’t memorized Suiter's book on star testing.
No matter who contributes what, you will eventually find your club entering the doldrums. I am convinced that happens to all clubs. Leastways it’s happened to all those I’ve belonged to and all those I’ve heard tell of. Even big, wealthy clubs in large cities have periods when they are more active and periods when they are less active. Our PSAS has ascended to highs of 15 or even 20 active members (right good for a small city that ain’t exactly scientifically oriented), and descended to lows of four or five lonely souls.
I used to believe a crisis was upon us during these declines, but I’ve come to believe that is just the natural ebb and flow of a club. There is always a core group that keeps a club alive year after year, but other members come and go. Some move away. Others find astronomy ain’t as much fun as they thought it would be (usually, these folks have discovered some work is involved). In other cases, especially, unfortunately, with that much to be desired twenty – thirty something demographic, family/kid commitments get in the way of amateur astronomy for a while.
While some of these dips are unavoidable, you don’t do yourself any favors when it comes to retaining members by allowing the club to get into a rut. An example? Years ago, the PSAS got into just such a rut. A deep one. Membership was down. Meetings were a real bore. Nobody outside the poor put-upon officers contributed anything to them. The rank and file sat like zombies listening to the Treasurer’s Report and hoping and expecting to be entertained. My friend and fellow member, Marvin Uphaus, had an idea: we’d have a member do a presentation each month, a talk on one of the constellations currently well placed for observing.
“Marvin’s constellations,” as we came to call the monthly presentations after Marv's untimely death, worked great. Every month a different member would be called upon to present a constellation. At first, we had to use a bit of gentle persuasion, but before long, we all got into the swing of things and pitched in. Every member did something once in a while. Nobody got back into the passive, “entertain me” mode.
All was well for a long spell. Too long a spell. I don't know how long Marvin’s Constellations continued, or how many fraking times we went ‘round the sky pictures visible from 30-degrees north, but it was a bunch. Years and years worth. Till, finally, one evening a presenter, who was as bored as his audience was, droned on and on and on. “This constellation has seventeen prominent double stars; I will now recite their magnitudes and separations.” Unk suddenly began to feel like Popeye the freaking Sailor Man: “I’ve had all I can stand; I can’t stand no more!”
When the evening’s constellation finally wrapped up, I allowed as how maybe, just maybe, we should broaden up the presentations. Certainly, it would be OK for someone excited about a constellation and its stars and deep sky objects to do a talk on it. But I thought that should no longer be required. Any subject would be welcome as long as it stuck with amateur astronomy, or at least the science of astronomy (we once had an unpleasant episode with a Creationist who tried to convince us Dinosaurs and men coexisted, just like on the doggone Flintstones).
Everybody seemed relieved that we’d no longer be yoked to the constellations. We may revisit Marvin’s Constellations it in the future, however. It was a good idea; we just fell asleep at the switch with it. Too much of the same-old, same-old is, well, too much. After years of the constellations, we were beginning to drive off members out of sheer boredom rather than involve them.
Other than letting your meetings get into a rut, what is bad? Endless Treasurers’ Reports and microscopically detailed minutes from the previous meeting. Yes, you need to give due attention to those things, but don’t make it into Chinese water torture: “Following the call for new business, Joe Schmoe excused himself to visit the little astronomers’ room, Judy Blue Eyes blew her nose, and Elmer dropped his pencil…then…” Use some common sense, ya’ll.
One thing that will destroy any club in short order? Feudin’ and fussin’. There will always be disagreements about the club and its direction. Disagreements between members, between officers, and between officers and members. It is up to your club’s leadership not to let them get out of hand.
When controversy arises, like the ever popular, “What the hail do we get out of the dadgum Astronomical League; why should we send ‘em all that money?” and threatens to escalate into something more than discussion, the person running the meeting has to keep the lid on. And do that without appearing to dismiss either side. One way of doing so is to form a committee to study and report on the issue, taking pains to see both sides are represented by clear and cool-headed members. I’ve seen all too many clubs, large and small, fail because nobody knew how to keep the peace.
Once you’ve got a good club going, believe you me, muchachos, you will want to keep it going. You’ll discover the club has become much more than a monthly ritual. Your fellow members have begun to seem like, yeah, family. Not a club member? Time’s a wasting: go rat-cheer and purty soon you’ll find yourself arguing about the League and the price of a good telescope with the rest of us—and having one hell of a time doing it.
Next Time: Shelley and Me...
Sunday, November 09, 2014
A Deep South Saturday: Project Scotty Night 2
I am not telling y’all anything you don't already know when I say the weather in the formerly sunny South and much of the rest of the good old U.S. of A. ain’t been very astronomy friendly the last few years. Of late, it’s been unusual for us to get even two clear nights over the four (now five) night run of the Deep South Regional Star Gaze. This year was different, Muchachos.
As you learned last week, ol’ Unk had a great Wednesday night, part of Thursday, and a spectacular Friday. The folks who’d been onsite since Tuesday had had yet another whole evening of deep sky craziness. As you also heard last week, that created a problem for your old Uncle. What the hail would I do with a Saturday night that was also going to be a good one? My observing list was finis.
I could always take one more tour of the summer/fall showpieces, you know, M13, M27, M15, M31, yadda-yadda-yadda. But that didn’t seem too productive a way to spend one of our increasingly rare dark and clear nights. Well, OK. What did I have going on when it came to visual observing projects? There was my Messier Album series, but that required the services of a 4-inch refractor, and I’d decided—maybe foolishly—against carrying one to DSRSG 2014.
That left only one recent and incomplete visual project, Project Scotty, my quest to observe all the objects in Deep Sky Wonders, the book Steve O’Meara compiled from Walter Scott Houston’s legendary Sky & Telescope column. Seemed like that might do the trick for Saturday. I hadn’t put an aperture limit on the scopes I’d use for Project Scotty, and I’d hardly begun it, being only five objects into a list that contained nearly 500 fraking DSOs.
|Breakfast: the biscuits were good, anyhow...|
Before I could get Project Scotty going again, however, I had to get through a long Saturday. We sure lucked out with our choice of dates weather-wise this time, but the days do go a lot quicker when the star party falls after the end of the dadgum Daylight Savings Time. Especially considering I was up right early Saturday, in plenty of time to catch another breakfast where I had to use a magnifying glass to find my scrambled eggs.
One thing that would make the day go a mite faster was that I had a second talk scheduled on Saturday afternoon. The first, “Things that Go ‘Bump’ in the Night Sky: Observing the STRANGE Stuff,” which I’d first given at this year’s Almost Heaven Star Party, had been a hit Friday afternoon. The second would be a gear-switcher, a program heavy on audience participation, a discussion of smart phones and tablets in amateur astronomy. By the way, campers, with my retirement I am almost always available to speak at your club or star party. Just give me a shout.
A wee bit before noon, Miss Dorothy and I walked over to the Feliciana Retreat Center’s auditorium, Barton Hall, not far from the observing field. We were just in time to catch Steve Edmiston, who preceded me with his presentation about making the screens of Android devices astronomy-friendly. That was a good thing. Not just because Steve’s talk was an excellent one, but because I was able to call on him during my presentation when questions arose concerning Android phones and tablets—Unk is most familiar with the iOS (iPhone, iPad) widgets. Anyhow, my Saturday talk went as well as the Friday one—purty good, that is.
After Barry Simon’s “The Fall Night Sky,” outlining the best objects to view and image during this transitional time of the year, D. and I headed back to the field to take down our tailgating canopy. Normally, we leave it up for the final night of a star party, but I thought it would be best to take it down on the last afternoon this time. I had a couple of stacks of astronomy student papers among other things awaiting my attention at home, and I wanted to skedaddle as soon after breakfast as possible.
If we tore down the EZ Up Saturday afternoon, not only would we not have to spend time cramming it back in its case Sunday morning, we wouldn’t have to wait around for the Sun to dry it first (the dew was heavy every night). Or, worse, have to unpack it again once we got home to let it dry out. I originally thought I might pack up the observing table, too, but decided I wanted to use the laptop Saturday night after all. The Toshiba would be fine on the table under its little corrugated plastic shelter without the protection of a canopy.
|Packing up the canopy Saturday afternoon...|
When we had the EZ Up in its case and in the truck, it was it was door prize time again. As usual, Unk was coming into the last prize giveaway empty-handed. Dorothy had won a nice, small red light Thursday (which she promptly gave away to a novice who’d arrived without a red flashlight), but I hadn’t got nuttin'. Amazingly, my name was called, but by that time, prize pickings was slim, and I responded “pass,” to allow somebody else to get one of the items that remained. I wouldn’t have minded winning one of the big prizes this year, but I am past the stage where I need yet another small gadget.
Which brought us to supper, a minor bring-down. I’d been craving the FRC’s delicious smoked brisket, a final night tradition for the past five years. Nope. As I mentioned last Sunday, instead we were served frozen (tasted that way, anyhow) hamburger patties on untoasted buns with bags of Lays chips on the side. Oh, it was OK, though the fixins was slim, not even any onions for gosh sakes, and certainly not quite what your hillbilly epicure of an Uncle had in mind.
What comes after supper on long Daylight Savings Time afternoons? Why a nap, of course. I grabbed my Nook and headed to our Lodge room to continue Triplanetary. Just as Doc Smith’s evil Eddorians and benevolent Arisians began slugging it out, Unk dropped off into a slumber which would likely have continued well past the time I needed to be back on the field if Miss D. hadn’t awakened me with “Getting dark, Rod.”
On the observing field, the routine was much the same as it had been. Uncover the scope, connect the Sky Commander DSCs to the laptop, align on Polaris and Fomalhaut, light off SkyTools 3 and begin touring the Universe. The star party was the first time I’d been able to try the combo of ST3 and the Sky Commanders under a dark sky, and I was pleased at how well they worked together. I found I occasionally had to mash the “Push-to” button on SkyTools more than once to ensure the DSCs received the object data, but that didn't cause major heartburn. It sure was nice to have SkyTools 3’s huge object database at the Sky Commanders’ disposal.
|Last door prize giveaway...|
Not that I’d need ST3’s enormous selection of catalogs Saturday night. The Scottys on this evening's agenda would tend to the bright and spectacular. I always like to revel in Cool Stuff on the last night. I also didn’t intend to cover a huge amount of ground. One of the few rules of Project Scotty is that each object gets plenty of eyepiece time. I figgered that, with occasional breaks, maybe ten DSOs would be enough. That would also allow me to proceed in a fashion suited to the fact that Unk was a mite weary after the preceding nights of his deep sky tear.
In addition to setting up telescope and computer, I hunted up the little am/fm radio I’d bought at freaking Wally World. I hoped to pick up Game 3 of the World Series out on the observing field, and with a little twiddling I found an FM station carrying Royals – Giants duel. The reception was lousy—north Louisiana is a radio wasteland and WWL in New Orleans didn't have the game on—but it was good enough for me to keep occasional tabs on the Giants as the evening progressed.
Hokay, what would be first? M2, the grand globular in Aquarius, was high and in the clear and and one of my all time faves. In Deep Sky Wonders, Scotty’s discussion of M2 begins with its naked eye visibility. Mr. Houston spotted it, he says, from the bayous of Louisiana, but he must have had darker and drier Louisiana skies than I did. On Saturday, the south at Feliciana was a dark gray and not likely to give up globs to Unk’s aged eyes.
In Old Betsy, M2 appeared fully resolved right to its small, bright core. One other thing I noted, and which I’ve noticed before, is that the cluster seems to me to have a strong bluish cast. Maybe coincidentally, Scotty mentions author Glyn Jones reported seeing a greenish-blue glow around the cluster. I didn’t see any such thing, but the faint blue tint of M2 itself was striking.
Next up was another glob, Pegasus’ M15, to which Scotty devotes considerable space. Understandably, since, as he says, “The view of M15 is impressive with anything from binoculars to the largest telescope.” It never fails to blow me away, and certainly did this time. In the 8mm Ethos (187x) the center of M15’s intensely bright core was nearly star-like. But that wasn’t the big draw; that was how far out its halo of tiny, tiny stars extended. It easily filled the field of the 100-degree Ethos 8mm.
|To Monster or not to Monster?|
Naturally, Scotty mentions M15’s notoriously tiny and dim planetary nebula, Pease 1. He doesn’t report seeing it himself, but does say a couple of observers he knows conquered it by “blinking” it with an OIII filter, repeatedly placing an OIII filter between eye and eyepiece and removing it in hopes of making the planetary alternately appear and disappear, making it more obvious. I’ve tried that and every other trick in the book over the years, including with my friend Pat Rochford’s old 24-inch Dobsonian at insanely high powers, but I’ve never even seen a hint of Pease 1.
Mr. Houston’s discussion of M39 starts out purty much the same as you’ll read anywhere; it’s a rather sparse cluster in Cygnus enclosed in a triangle of bright stars. But he doesn't leave it at the easy and obvious. He mentions a curious dark streak he’s noticed, a dark nebula 5-degrees southwest of the cluster. I’ve never seen a dark nebula in the area, and I am doubtful of ever seeing it. Scotty says following this dark lane leads you to the Cocoon Nebula, which he implies is more prominent. I know the Cocoon routinely gives me fits, so I don’t expect I’ll see Scotty’s Streak.
Not that I didn’t have a nice look at M39, which I always find to be prettier than I remember. At half a degree across, this Cygnus open cluster is a job for the 35mm Panoptic (42X). Its equilateral triangle of bright stars encloses a medium-rich group of similarly bright stars, about 20. These are set against a background of dimmer stars. There is an attractive double star near the center of the triangle.
That his dark nebula “leads” to the Cocoon Nebula is the only mention IC 5146, gets in Deep Sky Wonders. Frankly, in Scotty’s time, much of which was before mega Dobs, uber eyepiece, and super filters, it probably didn’t warrant much more. The Cocoon is not easy. It did not respond to my OIII filter, and while a Lumicon UHC filter improved it a little, it was still just barely visible as an east-west elongated patch of nebulosity around a small group of stars. It was best in the 35 Pan, being nearly invisible at higher power.
|The sky stayed beautiful and blue Saturday...|
Walter Scott Houston was the dean of deep sky observers. No fooling and no doubt about that, but he was a man of his time, just as Admiral Smyth was a man of his. I say that because the “controversy” Mr. Houston mentions concerning NGC 7000, the North America Nebula, has the flavor of bygone days.
This controversy had to do with the visibility of NGC 7000, especially in smaller telescopes. Scotty rightly observes it can be visible to the naked eye under good conditions, but he goes on to say it is invisible in a 6-inch f/4 while easy in an 11-inch. That seems at odds with what most observers experience today, that it is not hard from a dark site and is easiest with small, fast scopes. Scotty, of course, was writing before nebula filters became widely available and widely used—though he does mention an observation of the NAN with a UHC by Alister Ling. With an OIII, NGC 7000 and the whole complex of nebulosity around it is a wonder in Miss Dorothy’s OIII equipped 4-inch f/6.5 achromat.
Not that the NAN doesn't look good in a larger scope. It dang sure did on this night. It was very bright in the 35 Panoptic with a Thousand Oaks OIII. The Gulf Coast/Mexico/Florida region was, as usual, the most prominent area, but the entire nebula and the Pelican (IC 5070) as well were readily visible with a little scanning around. Several open clusters on the eastern seaboard, NGCs 6996, 6997, and 6989 were obvious and attractive.
Deep Sky Wonders gives considerable space to M31, though much of it is devoted to questions about the galaxy’s visible extent, its naked eye appearance, and its observational history rather than the particulars of observing it. Scotty does get to that, however, noting in particular the galaxy’s tiny, bright nucleus, which is one of my favorite features and which many observers seem to miss.
I certainly didn’t miss much on Saturday night. I’ve had better looks at M31 in the past, but maybe not much better. NGC 206, the huge star cloud in one of the galaxy’s arms was obvious and appeared elongated and grainy, though not as good as it was at the Chiefland Star Party in 2008. The nucleus was, likewise, prominent, but didn’t appear as tiny and bright as it had on that outstanding evening at the CAV. Otherwise, two of M31’s dark lanes were visible with the 13mm Ethos, a sure sign you’ve hit Andromeda on a pretty good night.
In his earlier columns, Scotty was writing in an era when many amateurs didn't observe even bright NGCs. That is particularly obvious concerning NGC 6826, the Blinking Planetary in Cygnus, a bread and butter object for novices these days. Mr. Houston opines that the planetary is “not well known today.” And he doesn't even mention the blinking effect—that the central star pops out when you use direct vision and the disk is more pronounced with averted vision. That may be because he observed the nebula with his 10-inch Newtonian; the blinking is more obvious with smaller apertures.
It didn't blink at all with old Betsy, with the slightly greenish disk being prominent with direct vision. Despite the nebulosity, the central star was also readily visible. In the 8mm Ethos, there were hints of radial striations in the annulus. I tried the TeleVue Big Barlow with the 8mm ocular in an attempt to get a better look at these features, but no dice.
When he comes to the Saturn Nebula, NGC 7009, Scotty, in typical fashion asks rather than tells. His question is, “What is the smallest telescope that will show the planetary’s faint extensions?” These "extensions" on either side of the Saturn Nebula’s oval disk, which made Lord Rosse think it resembled the planet Saturn in his proto-big-Dob, are not easy. I’d answer “12-inch,” but the ring is often very difficult in a 12. That was not the case on this evening, however.
NGC 7009 was good and high, and I was hoping to get a glimpse of its ring, but I had my doubts. The feature has never been overly clear in Betsy—not until this night, anyhow. The nebula was strongly blue, very elongated, and when the seeing changed, the ring would swim into view. I could see it at 187x, but had to take the power up to 374x to make it easy.
At that magnification, the ring still came and went, but when it was visible, it was astoundingly visible. Which brings to mind one of my maxims, “Amateur astronomers tend to use too little magnification rather than too much.” If I hadn’t pumped up the power here, I wouldn’t have gotten nearly as good a view.
M76, the Little Dumbbell (planetary) Nebula in Perseus, was one of The Man’s fave objects, and he often spread the word about it. Back in the hallowed day it was, surprisingly, considered one of the more difficult Messiers. I’ve seen it easily in a 60mm ETX refractor, but fifty years ago a lot of us would read the oft-quoted photographic magnitude for it, 12.2, and get scared off.
As Scotty says, on a good night with an 8-inch or larger telescope this little thing is a showpiece. In Old Betsy with the 8mm Ethos, the Dumbbell portion, the two lobes of nebulosity in contact, was amazingly bright. Dark lanes criss-crossed the dumbbell, and arcs of nebulosity were easy to see extending from each end of the object. There is little doubt the LPR filters we take for granted help a lot with M76—it was much better with my OIII than without.
M71 seems to be another of Mr. Houston’s pet objects, since he devotes more space to Sagitta’s globular cluster than most deep sky raconteurs do. That space is well deserved in my opinion. One thing is sure, on my DSRSG Saturday night the glob was bold and bright and resolved, visible as a triangular shape—or, as Scotty calls it, an “arrowhead.” It is very loose and in an incredibly rich star field.
In the past, there's been a question about the object’s classification—is it a globular cluster or is it an open cluster?—and Scotty makes note of that without coming down on either side. I’d say one look at the cluster’s color-magnitude diagram makes its status as a glob clear.
Then it was time to ring down the curtain for the night with a special object, the Phantom Galaxy, M74, which, as I said last time, put on a surprisingly good show—for a dim face-on Sc galaxy—at the 1994 Deep South. Scotty mentions the galaxy’s frustrating and difficult nature, and I agree with him on that. It is frustrating and difficult—if you want to see the spiral arms. It’s visible almost anytime as a smudge in an 8-inch scope under a dark sky.
Actually, M74’s spiral is only difficult sometimes. Or maybe most of the time. When the sky is just right, with the “just right” usually being a combination of steady seeing and dark skies, the Phantom offers up a heaping helping of spiral structure despite the fact that Scotty seems to believe seeing the spiral arms is impossible even with a 20-inch scope. In Betsy, the arms weren't as easy as they were in 1994 or on the above-mentioned night at the 2008 Chiefland Star Party, but they were obvious and beautiful.
My victory over M74 complete, I took a break, moseyed around the field to see what my pals were up to, and visited Barton Hall's Little Astronomers’ Room. Back at the EZ-Up, I started to grab a Monster Energy Drink outa the ice chest. And stopped myself. It was almost midnight. and there would be packing and the drive home on the morrow. Yes, not having to mess with the tailgating canopy would help, but there would still be plenty of work to do.
|Group picture courtesy of Barry Simon...|
Gazing across the field, it looked like many of Unk’s buddies had had the same thought. The field was emptying out. If I pulled the big switch right now, it would still be going on one by the time I made it back to our room. Not having the EZ Up to protect the gear from dew meant much of the stuff on the field needed to be gathered up and stowed in the truck. I pulled that accursed Big Switch.
On the way back to the Lodge, I reflected on this year’s DSRSG. It had been a dang good one. I must admit that when I am not imaging, I always feel a mite let down that I don’t have any “souvenirs” to take home at the end of the event, but it wasn’t just any old visual observing I did this time. I felt like a long overdue task was completed; a bow had finally been tied on the DSRSG ’94 package with the completion of my old observing list. The icing on the cake, if I can mix a few metaphors, was that I also advanced Project Scotty at least a little.
After a restful night, it was time to say goodbye to the old FRC for another six months (I dang sure hope to be back in April for the Spring Scrimmage edition of our star party). Dorothy and I agreed we’d had a great time in 2014. Maybe not as great as in 1994— likely no star party will ever equal that one for us—but a great time nevertheless.
Just after dawn, I was out to the chilly field to pack our remaining gear in the truck and, after retrieving D. and our suitcases and other room items from the Lodge, Unk pointed the truck east for the New Manse well before breakfast. Unlike a few times over the years, I was right sad to be leaving and didn’t want to stretch it out with long goodbyes. 2014 was one for the books, muchachos.
Next Time: Are You a Joiner?
Sunday, November 02, 2014
Sometimes You Get Do Overs: DSRSG 2014
I had a great time at the 1994 Deep South Regional Star Gaze, muchachos. Even back then, it was my “home” star party and a sentimental favorite. ‘94 was also the first time I attended the event with my lovely new wife, Miss Dorothy, following our marriage barely two months previous. Yes, it was a memorable year, but not for the observing. The lousy weather saw to that.
I did see some nice things at Dorothy’s first star party, including the Phantom Galaxy, M74. In fact, I got one of the best views I’ve ever had of that object that year. But something had long bothered me about 1994: the thick observing list that had sat on Chaos Manor South’s bookshelves for 20 fraking years.
‘94 was the year I was introduced to my first observing planning program, or at least proto observing planning program, David Chandler’s MS-DOS masterpiece, Deep Space 3D. The program is long gone for all intents and purposes, never having made the transition to Windows, but the list it helped me put together for that long ago star party has lingered on.
Late this past summer, as the date for the 2014 edition of “Deep South” approached, I began to think about what I’d observe at the event. I wanted to do something special on this, D’s 20th DSRSG anniversary. While I’m currently mostly an imager, video and DSLR, I thought visual might be more like it this time. Maybe with Old Betsy, my 12-inch Dobbie, whose first star party was, like Dorothy’s, DSRSG ’94.
What if I took it a step further? What if I didn't just use the same scope (albeit mostly rebuilt)? What if I finally ran that fat observing list? I still had it following our move; I’d found an honored spot for it on a shelf in Unk’s office in the New Manse. I pulled it down and had a look.
Not-so-old Unk sure was sanguine about observing back then. 327 dadgum objects of all types, including galaxies down to freaking magnitude 15 plus. Even dimmer quasars. Maybe I overestimated what a 12-inch—the largest scope I’d ever owned—could do from damp Mississippi skies (in them days, the event was held at Percy Quin State Park near McComb, Mississippi). Or maybe I just wanted to make sure I had enough objects to see me through three nights of deep sky heaven. Or maybe it was so easy make an observing list with DS3D that I got a mite carried away. To no good purpose, it turned out, since the weather shut me down before I could move beyond the bright and easy.
Over 300 objects, many of them dim and hard, seemed like a lot to Unk, even though Betsy has a Sky Commander digital setting circles computer now, and my eyepieces, Ethoses, are way better than what I had in ‘94. I sat down and began whittling away objects. Before I could whittle anything away, of course, I had to get the objects into a modern computer program. Could have used the exemplary Deep Sky Planner, but since I had the equally good SkyTools 3 open at the time, I used it. In an hour or thereabouts, the old list was reborn in ST3 format.
Now for the pruning. First to go were the more mundane objects I’ve logged over the intervening years. I did leave the oft-observed showpieces in, however. I also cut off most of the galaxies at just a smidge over magnitude 14. Dumped all the quasars (!). Finally, I trashed any open clusters I suspected were too large and/or sparse to look good—easy enough to check via SkyTools powerful interactive atlas. When I was done, I was left with a manageable list of 100 DSOs.
The list would be manageable if the weather cooperated, that was. As our departure date, 22 October, approached, it dang sure looked like it would. Wednesday would be dead clear. Some clouds Thursday, perhaps. More good sky Friday. Saturday, too. Frankly, I began to wonder whether 100 objects would be enough, even if I gave those that deserved it plenty of eyepiece time.
Anyhoo, almost before silly old Unk knew it, it was the Tuesday afternoon before the star party, and time to load up the truck. As y’all well know, I hate packing on star party morning, and in recent years have been doing that the evening before. While I’ve loaded our vee-hickle, Miss Lucille Van Pelt, a Toyota 4Runner, for many a star party now, I took no chances and used a CHECKLIST in hopes of not forgetting anything (I always do, anyway, of course). One thing was sure: getting truss tube Betsy in the 4Runner sure was a lot easier than getting Sonotube Betsy into my fraking Hyundai Excel on that Thursday morning in 1994 (in the early days, DSRSG was a Thursday – Sunday affair).
Tuesday night was spent doing a last review of my observing list, checking the dagnabbed Weather Channel one more time to make sure the forecast hadn’t changed (it hadn’t), and watching my fave new TV program, The Flash, with the aid of mucho Rebel Yell. I headed for bed shortly after nine to get plenty of rest. The drive to the Feliciana Retreat Center near Norwood, Louisiana where the star party is now held is just three hours, but there’d be unpacking and set up. And, I hoped, a long night under the stars Wednesday evening.
|On the road...|
Newlyweds Unk and D. enjoyed their journey to Deep South twenty years ago, and there is no doubt the route was more scenic then, down old Highway 98, through Hattiesburg, and into the piney woods of Mississippi. Now, it’s 1-10 to 1-12, I-12 to I-55, and a few miles of Louisiana state and county roads. Not as purty, but easier—there are not as many opportunities to get stuck behind Old MacDonald and his tractor on narrow country lanes.
There is also no denying the Feliciana Retreat Center is a better place for a star party today than Percy Quin State Park would be. Most fatally for that nice park, the light pollution dome from McComb is now large and intrusive, far more prominent than it was two decades ago. Yes, Percy Quin had nice air-conditioned group cabins, but FRC has nicer small motel-style rooms in a modern Lodge. You got hot meals as the state park, but the food at FRC is much better—if maybe not as mucho bettero as it used to be, as we shall see.
Rolling onto the observing field, our first stop, several things were evident: the FRC was still well-maintained despite the financial malaise it’s been suffering over the past year, the weather was just as beautiful as predicted—clear as a bell and in the mid-70s—and there would be a good turnout for the event this year. Despite the demands of jobs and kids and other mundane things, there were plenty of folks onsite at midweek; one whole side of the expansive field had already filled up.
The people there, including DSRSG Managing Director Barry Simon and our old friends Frank, Ron, and Gabe, were mostly hardcore regulars, but I suspected there’d be no attendance problem this year. Given the sky’s look, I was purty sure most of the approximately 100 folks who’d registered would show up before the end. I have a good time rain or shine, but for the more faint-hearted among us, the weather would not be a reason to stay home this year; there was little chance of much of anything but “shine.”
|The observing field Wednesday...|
Dorothy and I located a nice spot in one of the corners of the marked-off field. A space near a big shade tree to the south that would provide some relief from the Sun, but which would not cause too much sky-blockage heartburn. Our location was also close enough to the field power outlets, the “power tree,” that I could reach it with one long extension cord. I don’t need AC for Betsy, but it would be nice to be able run the laptop with it and leave the inverter and jump start batteries in the truck.
Tell y’all the truth, since I was going visual, set up was not a whole lot different from 1994. I had to bolt Old Betsy’s upper cage and truss poles to her mirror box rather than just plunk her Sonotube in the rocker box, but otherwise it was mostly the same: tailgating canopy (a much nicer one than our old tarp and ropes job), observing table, couple of camp chairs, ice chest, eyepiece box, and a few odds and ends.
The major difference, of course, was that our camp/observing table was twice the size of our old card table. Had to be to accommodate the 17-inch Toshiba laptop. Nostalgia is fine, y’all, but I ain’t a-going back to squinting at cotton-picking Sky Atlas 2000.
Set up, we hung on the field for a little while talking to our buddies and, in my case, admiring Frank’s recently purchased Takahashi Mewlon 180, which he had on his VX mount. Not every Mewlon I’ve looked through has had exquisite optics—though it turned out that Frank’s did—but every one of them has been a thing of beauty nevertheless.
Next stop was the Lodge to get settled in our little room, East 1. There was good and bad. The good was that in an effort to pull themselves out of the financial doldrums, I reckon, the FRC folks had been working on the Lodge rooms, painting, repairing, and disposing of the badly time-worn furnishings. Unfortunately, that meant our room did not have a desk. There were no drawers for our clothes and no place to put the laptop (the FRC has had very good wi-fi speed the last couple of years). I was told new desks had been ordered but had not yet arrived; this year we’d just have to make do.
Dorothy and I spent the time remaining before our first meal—supper was at 4 p.m. each day—visiting the vendor who set up in FRC’s nice facility, Barton Hall. This sizable auditorium is just off the field, and is also perfect for star party talks. This year's seller was Astrogizmos, and that was a good thing. I can almost always find something I need/have forgotten on Jeff’s tables. I will rarely buy something like an Ethos eyepiece at a star party, but I will buy the sort of stuff Astrogizmos stocks, like red lights, batteries, etc. This year I got a pack of chemical hand warmers (the one thing I’d forgot), and a nice little red LED table lantern.
|There is some pot roast there...somewhere...|
Then it was suppertime. Which turned out to be a minor disappointment—the meals were the only down-check I gave the FRC this year. Traditionally, Wednesday is grilled chicken night, nice big hunks of chicken. This time? Lasagna. Not bad, but not much of it, with the server giving each of us one serving spoonful. Tasted purty good, and with the rest of the chow, which included the FRC’s still good salad bar, the meal was enough. But just barely.
The same maintained at the other meals. Breakfast was good biscuits or (small) pancakes and adequate sausage or bacon, but just about the tiniest serving of eggs I have ever seen on a plate. I looked forward to supper Thursday, the Center’s legendary pot roast and mashed taters and gravy. It was still tasty, if not maybe quite as well prepared as in the spring, but I got half a small serving. The brisket that has been a treat on Saturday nights? Gone. Instead, we had frozen hamburger patties on untoasted buns. There was still desert, but it was not set out for us to serve ourselves. One of the FRC staff went around the tables dispensing small portions.
I understand the need to economize, but I am not sure doing so in such noticeable fashion is a good idea. Especially since meals are such a big deal at FRC, there not being much else to do during daylight hours. Nevertheless, the food is still better than what you get at most star parties. If they can at least keep it at the level it is at now, and maybe, just maybe, give you two spoonfuls of eggs in the morning, I reckon it will be OK. I was right glad I’d made a run on Wally World Tuesday for Jack Links and granola bars, though.
Food is a relatively minor part of the star party experience; observing is the main thing. Following a nap back in the room, I trotted to the field and got ready to go. That consisted of removing Bets’ AstroSystems cover, plugging her Sky Commanders into the encoders, and connecting the Commanders to the laptop. I don’t always run Betsy from a laptop, but I would on this night. Some of the objects on the list, particularly some of the open clusters (Kings, Czerniks, etc.), were not in the Sky Commanders’ library.
When dark came, I aligned the DSCs on two stars, Polaris and Fomalhaut, and essayed my traditional first night look at M13. Brought up the Messier list in SkyTools’ RealTime tab, highlighted M13, mashed the “push to” button, and the program intoned in her Audrey (Betsy) voice, “Push telescope to target!” SkyTools sends the object to the Sky Commanders, so all I had to do was push the scope until the numbers on the DSC display zeroed out.
In the 16mm 100-degree Happy Hand Grenade (Zhumell) eyepiece, the Great Globular was bright and rich despite it not being quite dark yet and despite somewhat high humidity. In went the 13mm Ethos, which also turned up the nearby galaxy, NGC 6207 looking surprisingly big and bold. I should have pumped up the power and looked for M13’s other “companion” galaxy, IC 4617, but I forgot to do so. I was champing at the bit and ready to get the list started.
It was time to work my 20-year-old list, and I worked it with a will beginning with the Veil Nebula. With my 35mm Panoptic eyepiece and Thousand Oaks OIII filter, the view was good enough to nearly blow me off my feet. Both the Bridal Veil (east loop) and Witch’s Broom (west loop) halves were as bright and detailed as I’d ever seen them. Even more amazing, the patch of nebulosity between the two, Pickering’s Triangle, was almost as prominent as the more oft-observed portions. This may have been the best look I have had at the Veil complex from anywhere other than the Texas Star Party.
What were the other hits Wednesday? Probably Pegasus’ NGC 7331 and Stephan’s Quintet. I attempted to duplicate my stupendous 1994 view of M74 first, but ‘twas not to be. The spiral structure was there, but not slam-you-in-the-face there. I figgered the humidity was just a mite too high, and resolved to try the Phantom again on the other nights.
The trick is not seeing NGC 7331, the Deer Lick Galaxy; at magnitude 10.2, it’s bright as galaxies go. The challenge is seeing detail, particularly the galaxy’s prominent sweeping spiral arm and, most of all, the four little NGC galaxies that lie just to the east. The arm was easy the second I put my eye to the 8mm Ethos. The small galaxies, the “deer” clustered around the salt lick of NGC 7331? Not quite as easy. While small, the dimmest, NGC 7336, is (supposedly) at magnitude 15.6. Under poor conditions, even the brightest one, magnitude 14.5 NGC 7340, can be hard for a 12-inch. Not on this night. A little staring and all four popped out.
Well, hell, if the Deer Lick was easy, how about Stephan’s Quintet? I can almost always pick up this group of five galaxies, which lies just 30’ to the south of NGC 7331, but sometimes all I can do with a 12-inch is pick it up—see the combined light of the galaxies as a spread-out haze. Again, tonight was different. I wouldn’t call the galaxies, which are clustered in an area a mere 4.5’ across, easy, but they were doable. As individuals.
And so it went from astronomical twilight at 7:30 till break time at midnight, when I stopped, changed the 9-volt battery that powers the DewGuard heater on Betsy’s secondary mirror, and trotted off to use the little astronomers' room in Barton Hall. Back on the field, I downed a Monster Energy Drink and went back to work. It was on the damp and chilly side now, but when the flesh began to feel weak, I’d duck under the cover and enjoy my Black Cat catalytic heater. Despite one side of our tarp-enclosed canopy being open to the elements, it was decidedly warmer underneath it.
As all things eventually do, however, enough finally became too much. Shortly after 2:30 a.m., I had to admit that heater or no, breaks or no, Monsters or no, I was cold and tired. No shame in that. Set Up Day is always a long one, and a quick look at the ST3 display showed I’d covered a lot of ground—to the tune of nearly 70 objects. I was able to do that many largely because, despite my pruning, many of the open clusters on the list, especially in Cassiopeia, were pedestrian in the extreme and didn’t warrant much eyepiece time.
I threw the big switch, which consisted of replacing the eyepieces in their box, turning off the Sky Commanders, returning the laptop to its case, turning off the DewGuard, covering Bets, and walking the ¼-mile back to the Lodge. As I rounded the bend in the gravel road and entered the clearing in the area of the Lodge, what should greet me rising in the east but Orion. DOH! I could hardly believe I'd forgot to look at M42! I'd just been too wrapped up in that consarned list.
Back in the room, I wet my whistle with some sarsaparilla and enjoyed a replay of a World Series game on the Youtube. Not that I watched the whole thing; long before it was over, I was off to Slumberland.
Back in the room, I wet my whistle with some sarsaparilla and enjoyed a replay of a World Series game on the Youtube. Not that I watched the whole thing; long before it was over, I was off to Slumberland.
I don’t know how I did it, y’all, but somehow, some way, I was up in time for breakfast at nine in the stinking a.m. Said breakfast consisted of, as above, a bare taste of scrambled eggs, but plenty of everything else. I was reasonably happy with my breakfast, in fact. I was not at all happy with the sky when I poked my head outside. Ground truth? Thursday morning 2014 was looking a lot like Thursday morning 1994. Hot. Sticky. Plenty of those despicable gray fluffy things sailing across the sky.
|Dorothy and our friend, Frank...|
Would we get anything Thursday night? I wasn’t sure. I'd just have to wait and see over the course of a long, slow day. The afternoon was spent in much the same way it had been in 1994. Talking to our buddies. Admiring their scopes. Sitting under the canopy semi-reading and semi-dozing. At least we didn't have to face set up under hot, humid conditions (which attract the area's biting no-see-ums) like we did in ’94.
Sunset came right on schedule and with it more clouds. What else came with sunset? A partial solar eclipse. Unk and his mates were nearly caught with our rompers down around our varicose veins late Thursday afternoon when we suddenly realized the eclipse would begin shortly. We barely had time to hotfoot it to the small FRC lake, which offered the most promising western horizon. Despite clouds and pine trees, we got a glimpse of the eclipse, both with Barry Simon’s filtered Zeiss copy-scope and with a pair of “eclipse glasses,” before Sol sank behind the tree line and more clouds poured in.
Amazingly, there was some clearing at astronomical twilight, and I got in maybe an hour total of on-again/off-again observing Thursday night. I worked the remaining open clusters in Cassiopeia until we were well and truly socked in again at nine. I stuck it out for another hour, decided nothing was gonna change any time soon, covered Bets, and headed to the Lodge.
There, I had a look at the weather resources on the Internet. ‘Peared we would be cloud free at 2 a.m. Should I set an alarm? Maybe just sit in the Lodge watching the Three Stooges DVD marathon that was in progress? I reckoned not.
Once I shut down, I usually stay shut down. I did uncover the scope and get going again at Chiefland last year when we got a sudden late night clearing, but usually when I throw the big switch, it stays thrown. I repaired to our room with the laptop and sarsaparilly and watched a DVD of my own, The Eyes of the Mothman, till the Sandman said “Howdy, Unk!”
Friday, day three, was another long one. It’s one thing to be down at the pea-picking Chiefland Astronomy Village where you can hop in the truck and head for Cedar Key. It is quite another to be at the FRC, where the biggest attraction is the Bill’s Dollar Store in Clinton, a dozen miles away. I spent most of the afternoon reading a book, a pulp, Doc Smith’s SF classic, Triplanetary (I am currently on a 1930s pulp magazine jag). Other than Monster Energy Drinks, the best star party accessory I’ve discovered lately is a Nook (or a Kindle). One of the original electronic ink versions, especially, which work perfectly on a sunny star party field.
Dorothy and I somehow made it through the interminable day, which had been resolutely sunny—it had indeed cleared about 2 a.m., I was told—and I got set for a long night. I was within about 20 objects of finishing what I was now calling the “DSRSG Anniversary List,” but what remained was some dadgummed hard ones that would take some time, including a passel of 14th magnitude galaxies in Lyra (yes, Skeezix, there are plenty of galaxies in Lyra).
Before girding my loins for the real dim, however, I went after The North America Nebula, NGC 7000. The previous year, it had been outstanding in Miss Dorothy’s wide field 4-inch f/6.5 refractor. The 12-inch couldn’t match the smaller scope’s field, but I hoped the combo of the OIII filter and my time-honored 35mm Panoptic eyepiece would show me something.
Did it ever! The view I had of not only the North America, but also the Pelican, IC 5070, was a knockout. The NAN was bright, and not just in the Florida/Gulf Coast area. It was also spangled with open clusters, including the prominent NGC 6989 and NGC 6986 on the eastern seaboard. I was even able to see the detached portion of nebulosity just to the north of the Pelican, a curious little cloud that, in images anyway, looks just like the face of one of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. I spent at least an hour scanning this wondrous nebula
After the fun of NGC 7000 and company, it was time for work. Not just those little galaxies in Lyra, but a few more admittedly boring open clusters in Cassiopeia and elsewhere. The high point of the second half of the evening was probably the Cocoon Nebula, IC 5146, in Cygnus. This little cloud is notoriously dim, but showed up—if barely—in the Happy Hand Grenade and a Lumicon UHC filter (the very same one I’d purchased at PSSG ’02), which seemed to do a better job than an OIII.
Once again, Unk's poor old bones were beginning to feel the chill, and our warm Lodge room began to sound better and better. But I was most assuredly not going to bed before M42 was up high enough to bother with. When it was, I looked long and lovingly at the marvel. I couldn't decide whether it was better in the 35mm Panoptic or the 13mm Ethos, so I kept switching eyepieces and drinking in the photons. Not only was the cloud exceptionally detailed, it had the strong greenish cast it assumes on the best nights.
Once again, Unk's poor old bones were beginning to feel the chill, and our warm Lodge room began to sound better and better. But I was most assuredly not going to bed before M42 was up high enough to bother with. When it was, I looked long and lovingly at the marvel. I couldn't decide whether it was better in the 35mm Panoptic or the 13mm Ethos, so I kept switching eyepieces and drinking in the photons. Not only was the cloud exceptionally detailed, it had the strong greenish cast it assumes on the best nights.
It was not long after two when I covered Betsy. I find that at my advanced age, I just can’t go as long doing visual observing as when I am warm and dry under a canopy looking at a monitor all night. Oh, I try to use my observing chair as much as I can to save my feet, but by midnight the cold and damp have usually got to me. Besides, I had an excuse this time: the DSRSG Anniversary List was done. Which was nice, but also a problem. What the hell would I look at Saturday night?
I ruminated on that on my way back to the Lodge. I thought about it while watching a replay of Game Two of the Series. I considered it as I was eating breakfast. And then, muchachos, the solution came. The light went on. I would look at—whoops, y’all. We are slap out of time and space for this Sunday; tune in next week to find out what your old Uncle did with a spectacular star party Saturday night.
Nota Bene: You can see many more pictures from DSRSG 2014 on Unk’s Facebook page.
Next Time: A Deep South Saturday…