I’ve remarked here a couple of times how fast the days, weeks, months, and years seem to fly by at your Old Uncle’s increasingly advanced age. However, you could have knocked me over with the proverbial feather when I realized Charity Hope Valentine has been at my side for some seventeen years now.
“What in pea-turkey is Unk going on about now?”
It’s like this, muchachos. With a waxing Moon in the sky, I thought it was
time to seriously revisit her. For me, like for many of you, Luna, Selene, Diana,
Hecate, Artemis was my first love in astronomy, a love I’ve never quite got
over. So, I thought I’d drag a scope into the backyard for a quick look. But which
scope?
“Quick look” is just about synonymous with “3-inch alt-Az
refractor,” and I could certainly have used my SkyWatcher 80mm f/11 on her AZ-4
mount. I wanted “easy,” yeah, but I wanted more. I wanted to kick up the
power on an evening predicted to deliver good seeing. The scope that would excel in all those
things? Charity Hope Valentine is an f/15 125mm aperture Maksutov-Cassegrain
with excellent optics, an OK drive, and at least some claim to portability—if
not anything approaching that of the SkyWatcher reflector.
As above, I was gobsmacked to realize how long Charity had
been with me. That one of my first blog articles about her, “Two-and-a-Half Years After the Honeymoon,” had been
written in <gulp> two thousand and fracking eight! Not only has she been
with me for a long while, it has been months since Charity was out
of her case, and it was time. So, one morning out here in suburbia, where every day (they say) is like Sunday on the farm, your Unk determined to give the scope a checkout prior to lugging her into the backyard.
Protected by the decent aluminum case Meade used to sell for
the ETX scopes, Charity is in good physical condition. Frankly, she looks brand
new and has weathered the near two decades since she came to stay with Unk
better than he has. My main concern was her LNT battery, a button
cell that keeps date and time current among other things. I found a 12-volt
power supply with a cigarette lighter style connector, plugged Charity in, and
fired her up. I was hoping the battery was OK, since replacing
it ain’t no fun, lemme tell you. It had been over two years since I’d swapped
it out, so I wasn’t hopeful.
Power up, mash “Mode,” scroll down to time…and… It was way off. But the fact the
Autostar HC displayed the date of the last time I used the scope, January
of this year, not something random, led me to believe the battery might have
some life left. I entered the correct date and time, cycled power, and, yeah,
it stuck. I figgered if time were off by evening, I’d have to bite the bullet
and replace the cell—“soon.” I’d manually set in the correct time if necessary
and keep on truckin’.
Some months back, I talked about resuming my lunar series, Destination
Moon. So how come up top it says “The Moon and You,” not “Destination Moon Night
Umptysquat”? A good reason. That series
was largely concerned with me imaging lunar features. I planned to do 300 of
them, the prominent ones shown in the old Moon map in the mid-sixties edition
of Norton’s Star Atlas. I got a lot of ‘em, but not all of ‘em. The
holdouts were those of unimpressive nature visible at inconvenient times. So… I
didn’t quite make it. Just like when young Rod resolved
to draw those 300 and also got much of the way there…but not quite
all the way.
My conclusion was if I failed to finish those particular
300 features twice, it meant I was likely never gonna do ‘em all. Also,
I wanted this series to be a little broader in scope. If I wanted to capture
Selene’s beauty with my ZWO camera, cool. But if I just wanted snapshot Moon
pictures with a cell phone, that would be good too. Heck, if I only wanted to
look. Or maybe make a quick little sketch of a feature than interested me like
I used to do all those years ago, I’d write about that.
After essaying Destination Moon’s multiple installments, I
was left knowing the Moon a lot better than I had during my deep-sky-crazy
years. Heck, I now probably know her surface almost as well as I did when I was
a kid and it was as familiar as Mama and Daddy’s subdivision, Canterbury
Heights. But I’d still need a map.
I’ve got several, including the outstanding Rukl Atlas of
the Moon (autographed by its late author at a star party, the Peach State Star Gaze, right after he
finished enjoying the Moon in my old Ultima C8, Celeste). But if you use a star
diagonal with your scope, as I do with Charity (she has a built-in diagonal),
be it refractor or CAT, printed maps will never match what you see. You
get an upright but mirror-reversed image.
Also, once you get beyond basic lunar touring, the level of detail in
Rukl is a mite low.
What to do? Easy-peasy. Virtual Moon Atlas. Yes, this (Windows) program by the author of the Cartes
du Ciel software, Patrick Chevalley, and lunar expert Christian Legrand is
still around and better than ever. I talked about it frequently in the Destination
Moon days, but suffice to say it’s the program I always dreamed of for lunar
observing. In addition to displaying crazy-detailed charts that can be
customized to match the view in any scope, it will even send your goto mount to
lunar features. It’s free, and if you are interested in the Moon, it should be your
number one observing tool.
So, on a gentle Gulf Coast early-November evening, one on
which the Moon shone down turning the landscape to silver, I set Charity up in
the driveway, a spot with a good view of the eastern horizon. All ready to go,
I turned the on-off switch to “on” and checked date and time. The date was still
good, but time was already off by over six hours. I set it correctly and
returned inside for a box of eyepieces.
What sort of oculars would I use with Charity this evening?
Nothing fancy. I didn’t feel the need to drag out any of my heavy-metal TeleVue
or Explore Scientific eyepieces. Instead, I grabbed the box of Celestrons I won
years ago at one of the last Deep South Regional Stargazes I attended. They are
all 1.25-inch (Charity is limited to that format anyway) Chinese Plössls that
perform just fine. Frankly, it’s been quite a few years since I’ve seen a truly
bad ocular from any half respectable vendor.
In went a 32mm for alignment. I coulda grabbed a crosshair
reticle eyepiece out of Charity’s case up in the house, but I didn’t feel like
going inside again, and a so-so alignment would be good enough for lunar work
anyway.
Anyhoo, Charity is a PE model ETX, which means she can
perform an automatic alignment not unlike a GPS scope sans GPS. Set her in home
position and she does a little dance, finding north and level. This took a
couple of minutes, but eventually she headed for alignment star one, Vega. It
wasn’t in the eyepiece, but just outside it. The next star was a problem,
though.
Because of my position in the backyard, many of Charity’s
choices were in the trees. I rejected one star after another till we got to
Enif and could finish up. How was the
resulting alignment? Saturn was in the eyepiece at 60x when Charity stopped, no
problem. OK, OK! I’ll fess up. That was the result of my SECOND
alignment. In typical Uncle Rod fashion, I kicked the tripod by accident,
ruining the first one just as I finished centering Enif. In my defense, the
legs on Charity’s tripod are more wide-spread than on most.
It shouldn’t be surprising mighty Eratosthenes was my first
stop. It was perfectly positioned at 8.5 days, just a bit off the terminator.
It would be hard to miss even if this 60Km diameter crater didn’t display such
beautifully sharp, terraced walls. It is located at the termination of the
lunar Apennines; your eye just naturally follows their arc to this stupendous formation.
Despite blah-blah-blah seeing Charity easily revealed the complex central peak
and the rough floor of this great crater.
Where next? I moved north, flying over a tremendous amount
of territory LM style with a push of an Autostar direction button. I skimmed over many
wonderful destinations, but something had caught my eye; that “something” being
the amazing 101Km crater (or is it really a walled plain?), Plato. While Plato,
lying at the other terminus of the huge arc of mountains that begins as
Apennines and winds up near Plato as Alps, looks elongated due to its position,
it’s, like almost all craters, actually round.
What does every observer long to see of this
giant? Some of the craterlets that pepper the dark lava-floor. At eight and a
half days, the crater is a little far from the terminator to make that easy but running up the power to 250x and waiting for good seeing stretches revealed
a few spots that mark the (relatively) tiny pits.
What else is of interest in the area? Plenty. Only beginning with the Alpine Valley, which
runs for over 130 Km through this mountainous area of the Moon. It’s beautiful
in any telescope, but the prize is the rille down its center. About a mile
wide, this sinuous “channel” is a high challenge for a visual observer even
when the Alpine Valley is perfectly placed. I’ve seen it at those times, but,
frankly, the best way to view it is really in images with a planetary camera like my little ZWO.
One more, though. That “one more” was mighty Tycho. When the
Moon approaches full, Tycho is the most prominent feature on Luna thanks to its
draw-dropping system of lunar rays. End of story, game over, zip up your fly. But
even at this phase, it stood out like a sore thumb in the rough lunar
highlands.
What makes Tycho so prominent even when its rays don’t shine
is it is sharp, and it is young (the reason its rays are still so prominent). This
86Km diameter formation’s imposing walls contain a complex and interesting triple-central
peak. Anyhow, Tycho just looks young (it’s less than 1 billion years old) and is eye-catching at any phase.
And that was that. I could have kept going, but I decided to
savor what I’d seen and visit more old friends “next time.” One of the beauties
of Miss Valentine, of course, is she’s easy enough to get back inside and in
her case despite bringing quite a bit of horsepower to the observin’ field.
Soon, I was in the den watching TV with the cats, sipping a portion of Yell,
and strategizing about the upcoming eclipse…
The Great November 2022 Total Lunar Eclipse
Nah, not as good as a Christmas eclipse, but this one was pretty spectacular from the ‘Swamp. Course,
there would’ve been no eclipse at all for Unk if he hadn’t been able to drag
himself outa bed at freaking 4am. Amazingly enough, he did! I’d stationed a tripod bearing a Canon DSLR with a medium telephoto lens by the front door so things wouldn’t be too painful at
that now unaccustomed early hour (I went about ten years getting up a 4:30
every morning for work, but that seems a long, long time ago). I’d just waltz
into the yard with the rig, shoot some pretty pictures, and that would be it. I
hoped.
There’s not much more to tell. It had been a while since I’d
shot a lunar eclipse, but I still remembered how. Lens wide open, ASA 1600,
exposures under a second, 250mm of focal length, lots of shots. Despite my bleary
eyes, I could tell the images displayed on the Canon’s little screen were
pretty good. One nice thing was Luna was in a fairly star-rich area (and Uranus
was nearby), making her extra photogenic. It was a pretty dark eclipse,
too.
Done just before five, I downloaded the images to a laptop
to make sure all was well and uploaded one to Facebook to share with my
friends. Yep, looked purty darned good, I told Miss Dorothy, who was bustling
about, serving the felines their breakfast at their strong insistence.
To be honest, I’d been sorta dreading the morning…having to get
up so early, get a camera outside, and see if I remembered how to take lunar
eclipse photos. But it all went amazingly smoothly…the whole thing was, to
quote the poet, “simple — neat…no trouble at all — not the least.” I was glad I’d
imaged (and experienced) this grand eclipse.
We really are fortunate to have such a big, close and spectacular satellite aren't we? Even with all the light pollution and frequent poor seeing from my yard here on the south coast of British Columbia the Moon is a reliable and faithful friend. I can only rarely push the magnification up over 200X with my 4" refractor here though. 100X - 150X is what I use most of the time. My highest power eyepieces are a 10mm and 7mm giving 150X and 217X and I strongly suspect that getting a new eyepiece that splits the difference could be worthwhile.
ReplyDelete