Sunday, April 20, 2014
My Favorite Fuzzies: M51
Your old Uncle Rod is hoping the weather is changing for the
better as spring comes in, muchachos. But
it dang sure ain't yet. There’s a big Moon in the sky, and the clouds are still hanging in—usually the suckers
taunt me by clearing out for the full Moon. Lunar eclipse? Fuhgeddaboutit. Not
only was there not a single break in the overcast Monday night, it rained torrentially.
I haven’t been able to continue my Destination Moon lunar imaging program. Much
less shoot Mars. Or even do the spectra of a bright star or three with RSpec.
I am for sure hoping for better weather for next week’s Deep South Regional Star Gaze Spring Scrimmage
star party. As you might expect, the weatherman is not predicting smooth
sailing for the event, but Unk is still hoping. Anyhow, till I can get out and
actually do some observing (with the
new Mallincam Micro, I hope), here’s another entry in my “best DSOs” series…
Your first look at a deep sky object is usually memorable—if
not always in a good way. There are
those fuzzies that disappoint badly, like M101 disappointed me the first time I saw
it—or, more properly, didn’t see it—in
my Palomar Junior. Then there are those that blow you freaking away on night
one, the M13s and M42s. Most, however, fall into category three:
“Yeah…OK…that’s it?” In other words, not great, not bad. There, but Just OK.
Like the Whirlpool Galaxy, Messier 51, in a light polluted sky.
As I’ve told y’all before, my favorite activity when I was a
proto-amateur, a ten-year-old kid wishing and hoping for a telescope, was mooning
over deep sky pictures in the few “space books” I owned, Stars and a one or two others. The
few in the Kate Sheppard Elementary School library. The even fewer in the
bookmobile that pulled up at the filling station down the road every other
week.
My fave, or course, was M101, the Pinwheel. A close second,
howsomeever, and maybe actually prettier, was M51, the Whirlpool. While M101 looked
a little more like what little Rod thought a galaxy should look like, M51 had a small companion galaxy, NGC 5195, and the
Whirlpool’s spiral arms, I thought, looked more even distinct than the
Pinwheel’s—in pictures, anyhow.
My Pal (left)... |
It was a good thing I’d failed at hunting for M101 with my
Palomar Junior before I went after M51. That lessened my shock and
disappointment considerably. Before we get to how the Whirlpool Galaxy looked
in my humble scope’s 1-inch Kellner and ½-inch Ramsden eyepieces (no silly
little millimeters for us back then), though, let’s get the skinny, the stats, the straight poop on this great galaxy.
M51 is one of those Messiers that were actually discovered
by ol’ Chuck himself. Charles Messier, out hunting comets one cool Paris
evening in October of 1773, ran across one of his prototypal “nebulae without
stars” in the small constellation Canes Venatici. He noted this non-comet was
very difficult to see in his 3.5-inch refractor. Not only did he have a hard
time seeing the Whirlpool, he couldn’t see NGC 5195 at all. Discovering that
fell to his BFF, Pierre Méchain, in March of 1781.
What was M51,
anyway? Nobody knew. Not till the early years of the 20th century did we learn
that it was a galaxy, an “island Universe” just like the Milky Way, albeit smaller, thanks to the work of Edwin Hubble and the other giants of those
years. The man who set us on the road to figuring out M51, however, was William
Parsons, Lord Rosse, who, in 1845, was the first person to see M51 as something
other than a round “double nebula.”
Actually, Sir William Herschel’s son John had seen something beyond the round fuzz-balls other
observers recorded when he observed M51 with one of his large telescopes. John
couldn’t quite see what the hell was
going on, however. His drawing shows M51’s center surrounded by a ring-like
structure.
It took Parsons a couple of tries before he was sure he was seeing a spiral pattern in the galaxy. Even with his massive 72-inch Dobsonian-style reflector at
Birr Castle in Ireland. Maybe because he was
in Ireland with its uncooperative skies. Or maybe because he had no way of
knowing what he ought to be seeing.
John Herschel's M51... |
Anyhoo, on an exceptional April night in 1845, Parsons was
able to observe the galaxy’s spiral arms, and subsequently made drawings and
painting that don’t look much different from the sketches amateurs make today.
After his observation, other astronomers began to see M51’s spiral with smaller
instruments—once you know what’s there to see, it’s much easier to see it. Incidentally,
Parsons apparently never referred to the galaxy as the “Whirlpool,” and it’s not clear who
gave it that nickname.
In the following decade or two, astronomers began to see
spiral form in many dim nebulae, failed to resolve those nebulae into stars
no matter how hard they tried, the term “spiral nebulae” was coined, and
astronomy was set on the path to unlocking one of the big secrets of the
cosmos.
“That’s cool, Unk, but what’s the Whirlpool like in a scope?
How big, how bright?” Well, Skeezix, M51 is a Hubble type Sbc near face on
spiral galaxy. In other words, it is a spiral galaxy with arms that are neither
tightly nor loosely wrapped, and which is oriented close to edge-on, so we get
a nearly perfect view of its disk. While it is relatively bright at magnitude
8.7, it’s also relatively large at 9.8’ x 7.8’, so, as is the case with all
face-on spirals, its light is badly spread out. How bad? Center a magnitude 9
star in your eyepiece and defocus until it’s 10’ across. That bad. It is, however, visible in a small telescope, even a
Palomar Junior, even from light polluted suburban skies.
What did M51 look like with the PJ from Mama and Daddy’s
backyard in the 1960s? Or with a 6-inch Newtonian from a house not far from
Possum Swamp’s shopping mall in the 1980s? Not much, friends, not much. But not
bad either. It was not a complete failure like M101, at least.
From any scope sited in light polluted skies, you can only
expect so much. M51 is not overly hard to locate, but is not overly easy to
find, either. Its position three-and-a-half degrees south of the “tail” star of
Ursa Major (the last star in the Dipper’s handle) is not difficult to get on,
but if you are not careful and don’t use a medium powered eyepiece to spread
out the sky glow, you are liable to pass right over it. Especially if you are
used to seeing the galaxy from dark locations or, like Unk when he was a sprout,
know if only from its pretty pictures in books. You will be expecting something
bright or at least something immediately obvious in the field. It may not be.
It may be visible at 50x- 75x, but
maybe not. You may have to play the
balancing act with M51.
The Leviathan of Parsonstown... |
Balancing act? Yep. The Whirlpool is large, about 10-minutes
across. Actually, a little more than that when you include its buddy, NGC 5195.
So, you’ll need an eyepiece field at
least 20’ – 30’ in diameter to take in the whole object and leave plenty of
dark space around it to provide contrast. You’ll also want an eyepiece that
will provide high enough power—I like about 150X—to spread out and thin out the
background sky glow. My fave M51 eyepiece used to be the venerable 12mm Type 2 Nagler
when I went after the Whirlpool with a C8.
The wonderful thing? You can get all the performance of a
Nagler II today for far less than what I paid. Explore Scientific will sell you an 11mm 82-degree field eyepiece for freaking
172 dineros—considerably cheaper than the Nagler was in 1994. I’ve tried the ES
82s in the field, and while I’ve been spoiled by today’s 100-degree AFOV wonders,
the ES 82 could be a real sweet M51 eyepiece.
“What the frak did you see, Unk, what did you see?” On an
average night in the city or deep suburbs with a 4, 6, or 8-inch, what I saw
and still see is the same thing early observers saw, a pair of blobs, a double nebula, the bright
centers of the two galaxies. That was at least something, and it didn’t threaten to crush little Rod’s spirit like
his continual failure with M101 did. At least I was seeing the
millions-of-light-years-away marvel that was the Whirlpool Galaxy, and my imagination
could fill in the blanks.
On the very best nights in the city, I can also make out a faint
haze, a very faint nebulous haze, around the bigger blob that is M51, haze that
represents the disk of the galaxy. On one particularly cooperative early spring
night when I was doing the observing for my book, The Urban Astronomer’s Guide, my
8-inch f/5 Synta Newtonian began to show the very vaguest hints of spiral
structure. But it was not easy, not easy at all. It took at least half an hour of
staring at the galaxy with a dark piece of cloth draped over my head to exclude
ambient light before I could reliably see a trace of dark lane detail.
Want to kick it up a
notch? Get out of town. At least as far as what is called the “suburban – country
transition zone,” which, twenty something years ago, was, for Unk, a spot near
Hurley, Mississippi not far from the Alabama – Mississippi state line. That was
the old Possum Swamp Astronomical Society Dark Site, and it was not too bad.
Not till the dadgum gambling casinos were built along the Mississippi Gulf
Coast and began shining spotlights and
lasers up into the sky and burning millions of parking lot lights all night long.
DSI M51... |
Me and my buddy Pat and one or two other PSAS stalwarts
would gather at “Hurley” on dark Saturday nights for our deep sky runs. Just like today, Unk could be found out there
on evenings when any sensible person would stay home due to weather. And, then
as now, despite being younger and stronger and armed with a Walther PPK, I
would get spooked by Mothman and The Little Grey Dudes from Zeta Reticuli when I
was all by my lonesome.
So what if it was
cloudy? Maybe it would clear. This was a year or so before I met Miss
Dorothy and, being recently divorced, I usually didn't have much else to do on
a Saturday night anyway. I’d haul my homebrew 6-inch Newt to Hurley and hang
out till it was obvious the clouds were there to stay or a twig snap caused by
a passing possum (“WHAT WAS THAT?”) conjured up visions of the Deliverance Gang and Unk skedaddled.
Sometimes, however, sometimes very, very occasionally, the
weather gods would have mercy on not so old Unk, and throw him a bone. So it
was one evening in the spring of ’93. I was between decent scopes, having sold my
Super C8 Plus to finance the divorce. I hadn’t saved up enough for a new SCT, and
didn't even have the 8-inch f/7 Coulter Odyssey yet, which would be the next
scope down the line for me.
The sky was suddenly and unexpectedly cloud-free and the
imaginary baddies who’d begun to devil me had shambled and flapped off. What would I look at?
I hadn’t had a good view of M51 since I’d moved back to the Gulf Coast from
Arkansas, and the galaxy was now out of the Swamp’s light dome as the Dipper
began to approach its “pouring out” stage. Truthfully, I didn't expect much. I
wasn’t a very happy camper, having had to drop back from 8-inches to 6-inches, but
I still knew the skill and perseverance of the person behind the eyepiece is
what counts most, so I decided to give the Whirlpool the old college try.
I’d like to tell you I was blown off my feet by M51, but I
wasn’t and you won’t be either, not at a fair-good site with a small telescope.
It was nothing like it had been with the Orange Tube C8 from the Ozarks. And
yet…and yet…as I continued to stare, using a 12mm Vixen Orthoscopic and a 25mm
Vixen Kellner, there were the spiral arms. They didn’t put my eye out, and I
could not hold them steady, but they were there—once in a while. The nucleus of
M51 was a small, and so was that of NGC 5195. What was not there? The “Bridge” of nebulosity that connects M51 and NGC
5195. That is the next stop on the road, the next goal of an M51 pilgrim.
Deeper DSI M51... |
The Bridge, the trail of dust and gas NGC 5195 has pulled
off its big compadre as it recedes into the distance, looks bright in images,
but it is not. Not hardly. The only really good visual look I have had at it
with any telescope other than Tom Clark’s 42-inch Beast was with my 12-inch
Dobsonian, Old Betsy, when Miss Dorothy and I attended the 1999 Texas Star
Party.
Despite its location way out west at Prude Ranch in the
backyard of Macdonald Observatory, you cannot always count on clear skies for
TSP. But you dang sure could in May of 1999. Not only was it clear, it was terribly dry—it
hadn’t rained to speak of since the previous November. In my experience, “dry”
helps almost as much as “dark” when you are chasing tough objects.
First night of the star party, I had a long list of objects
to work, TSP Observing Program Guru John Wagoner’s The Planetary Party. A tough list of umpteen planetary nebulae. I knew I
needed to get started on it right away if I was gonna get my pin by the end of
the event, but I couldn’t. Not for about an hour after astronomical twilight
finally arrived, anyhow.
M51 hooked me. It did blow me off its feet this time, in a
way like it never has since. It bounded into the field of the 12mm Nagler, and
the more I looked, the more I saw. The nucleus was a tiny, burning point smack
in the middle of the galaxy’s round, bright center. Not only was the spiral
structure easily visible, the arms were, I could finally see, not smooth, but
uneven, curdled-looking along their edges. There were countless clumps of dark
and bright material along their lengths.
The big surprise? And not necessarily a good one? I could see the bridge, including with direct
vision, but it was not that easy, not even in a 12-inch from Prude Ranch, which
should give you some idea of the challenge it is from east of the Mississip. If
you can see the connecting arm between M51 and NGC 5195 from your club site,
even if it takes a big gun, a 20-inch or larger scope to do it, give yourself a
big pat on the back.
What’s the next shrine on the M51 pilgrimage? More details
in the two galaxies, like HII regions, and, especially, the tiny galaxies like
IC 4278 littered across the field. Some of these far distant sprites, including
the Magnitude 14 range 4278, are in range of bigdobs, but with lots of ‘em, like
pretty little edge on IC 4277, which is northeast of NGC 5195, you have entered
the realm of “very small and very dim,” and it’s time to replace your eye with
a camera.
My reward for doing the Planetary Party... |
For the camera of a fast focal ratio scope, the galaxy and
its fellow traveler are extremely bright and, most of all, photogenic, with
those lovely spiral arms, the interacting companion, and the wee galaxies
scattered across the frame. I was still skeptical, though, when I finally
buckled down and learned to CCD.
As you-all know if you’ve read my tales of my imaging
misadventures here, my initial CCD camera, an MX516 from Starlight Xpress,
turned out to be a big bust and soured me on electronic deep sky imaging for
dang near three years. Till one day the good folks at Anacortes Telescope and Wild Bird (the proprietors of Astromart) emailed me with
the news that Meade had come out with a new and inexpensive color CCD camera
that would be a game changer. Would I like them to reserve a DSI for me? Yep, I
reckoned I would. I knew I needed to learn the art of computerized
astrophotography, and at the DSI’s reasonable price of about 300 bucks I
figured I could afford to give it another try.
The DSI was not without its faults. The program you ran it
with, “Envisage,” sure was full
featured—it would do everything but cook the grits in the morning—but its
rather counter-intuitive user interface made it a nightmare for some folks. Also,
the camera’s sensor, a one-shot color 1/3-inch Sony chip, was small and could
make goto accuracy and guiding critical.
Not knowing too much about the CCD game despite having played
with the MX516 for a while, I didn’t realize I ought to be skeered because of
the above, and wasn’t. After a night of playing with the DSI at the PSAS’ old in-town
observing site, I got the camera to work and work like crazy. The software took
a while to master, but it could be mastered, and it had some real good
features—like the ability to take short subframes and stack them into a final
image in real time.
The Earl of Rosse's backyard observatory... |
How about goto and guiding? Goto wasn’t much of a problem.
My new CG5 mount was pretty good, even though it was still on the original
iteration of the Celestron GEM software in 2005 and lacked the calibration
stars that would later make the mount’s goto deadly accurate. When the CG5
missed putting a DSO on the DSI’s chip, I just used “Precise Goto.” The mount
would slew to a bright star near the target, I’d center that on the laptop
screen, and the CG5 would then move on to its final destination, invariably
putting the DSO in the field of the DSI.
What also helped was the Meade f/3.3 reducer I screwed onto
the C8’s rear port. At that focal ratio, the field of the camera was just about
right for most DSOs, and exposures were gratifyingly short. 20 or 30 stacked 30-second subframes made for
a reasonably dense, reasonably noise-free picture. Guiding? We didn't need no stinking guiding. Unguided
30-second exposures were usually good. If the stars weren't always round, they
were close to it.
Got M51 on the laptop, focused up with the aid of Envisage’s Magic Eye focus tool, took
the dark frames Envisage told me to
take, covering the scope’s corrector when the software said to and uncovering
it when the dark series was done. I then asked the program to start taking
30-second exposures and to take them till I said “stop.”
What followed was real cool, y’all. As I watched, Envisage took subframes of M51, stacking
those that met its quality criteria. Slowly, an image of the Whirlpool began to
build up on my monitor, until, after about half an hour, I had a picture that
made my jaw drop.
No, my shot of the Whirlpool from that night ain’t worthy of
a Jason Ware or a Bob Gendler—not even close. The uncooled camera was
understandably noisy, and my processing skills were nonexistent, but that M51
was mine. I took it with my CCD camera. It was in color. It showed all kinds of spiral
detail. The Bridge was crazy visible. The faint fingers of nebulosity extending
from NGC 5195 were there, and I could even see a couple of them little field
galaxies.
I’ve since moved on to far more sophisticated cameras. My
SBIG can blow the doors off the humble DSI with its more sensitive and larger
monochrome chip. My Mallincams can do about what the DSI could do in half an
hour in thirty seconds. I still love that DSI, though, and I still have it. It
got me over the CCD imaging hump, and I’ve a mind to drag it out again and do a
little picture taking with it this spring and summer, if just for old times’
sake.
Messier 51? It is different from my everyday wonders like M42
and M13 in that I’ve had to work at it over the years to get it to give
up its secrets. But it has, muchachos, it has, and it’s been fun unlocking
those secrets. It’s a wonder, but a subtle wonder, and sometimes that is the
best kind.
Next Time: Spring Scrimmage…