Saturday, December 24, 2016
Issue #523: Happy Christmas 2016...
Merry
Christmas, y’all! This is gonna be a short one tonight. You see, I screwed up. Bad. I thought I had everything ready
for Christmas: a nice turkey, the ingredients for my (justly) famous giblet
gravy, sufficient side items, bread pudding, and the components for my insane bourbon
sauce. Yes, I was feeling good. Not stressed out at all.
Until
yesterday afternoon: “Oh, my God. I forgot to move the turkey from the freezer
to the refrigerator!” The bird would take four days to defrost in the fridge
and I only had two left. What would I do? What WOULD I do? The answer was, “You’ll
get up a 2:30 in the morning and defrost it in cold water.” So that is what is
gonna happen tonight, campers.
Of course, I
knew there was no point in trying to go to bed early. I used to to do that
in my engineer days. When I’d go on a sea trial for a cruiser, or a destroyer,
or a landing ship, I’d need to get up a 2:30 or 3:00. So, I’d go to bed at 6:00
p.m. And if I did that, I’d toss and turn for hours. So, I didn’t plan on retiring
till 9 or 10 or 11 or so.
But that still wouldn’t
leave me much time to compose the traditional Christmas Eve blog. You won’t get
a long remembrance of Christmases past (which, given my current mind-set, may be
a good thing). I thought it would, however, leave me time for my traditional
Christmas Eve look at the greatest Christmas ornament of all, M42.
After a
couple of years of being skunked badly, tonight looked to be reasonably clear.
Given my early wakeup call, I didn’t want to fuss with a big telescope, so it
was my beloved SkyWatcher 3-inch f/11 refractor that got stationed in the
backyard as I waited for the Hunter to get up off the horizon. Yes, early
on the sky just looked great; it was a lovely blue at sundown. Surely, I’d
spend the late hours of this most wonderful of nights admiring the winter
jewels with my little telescope.
Alas, ‘twas not to be. While waiting for Orion to get nice an high, I spent about half an hour in my
shop, the vaunted Batcave, talking to a friend of mine on the phone. When I came out around 10:00, not only was the refractor sopping wet with dew, fog, dense fog, had
moved in, and the sky was like cotton batting.
I hope you
were able to see more than I was on this most numinous of evenings, but don’t worry
about me. Despite being skunked astronomy-wise for the third year in a row,
hope springs eternal in my heart. Someway, somehow, it will be a great
Christmas and a great year despite everything. A year when your and my hopes
will somehow be realized.
Son of Rumours
As I sat in the den half drowsing
after I got up at 2:30 a.m. to begin defrosting that darned bird, I recalled a
few things I’ve been meaning to mention to y’all…
This is
sorta like a return of the old “Rumours” column in my ancient newsletter, Skywatch (you can read over ten years of
back issues here if you are interested). Maybe
I will do this every once in a while, when I have little items to share that
don’t fit anywhere else (like the long, long-running “Strays” in QST magazine).
The first of
these things is that, as I mentioned last time, Steve Tuma is discontinuing
sales and support of his Deepsky software. That has turned out to be happening
a little quicker than I imagined it would, with the program’s website already
off the air. Steve has mentioned in his Yahoogroup that he does have a few DVD
sets remaining. He also says he’s open to the idea of allowing someone to post
the program’s zipped files on a server. Contact him at stuma@comcast.net.
Another new
Celestron mount? It appears so, the
CGX-L. This is apparently a
replacement for the CGEM DX. It is the CGX (which replaced the CGEM) mount with
a CGE Pro tripod, a heftier counterweight shaft, and an extra Aux port. I say
“apparently” because as soon as someone noticed a webpage on Celestron’s site
announcing the new GEM and spread the word on Cloudy Nights, the webpage and
all other Celestron mentions of the L vanished from their site. CN also soon deleted
all the threads about the CGX-L.
Is this
going to be the replacement for the CGE Pro as well as the CGEM DX? I’m not
sure. I’ve long thought Celestron would get rid of the Pro. Why should Synta
continue to produce two mounts with similar capabilities, the CGE Pro and the
EQ-8? I was thinking the “new” Pro would be an EQ-8 with servo motors and a
NexStar hand control, but you never know.
UPDATE: Somebody archived the CN thread and Celestron's web page about the new mount and made this video, which is rather illuminating. Given what's here, I am rather convinced that the CGX-L is the new CGE Pro. Why Celestron removed the page, and why CN deleted the threads, I haven't a clue.
UPDATE: Somebody archived the CN thread and Celestron's web page about the new mount and made this video, which is rather illuminating. Given what's here, I am rather convinced that the CGX-L is the new CGE Pro. Why Celestron removed the page, and why CN deleted the threads, I haven't a clue.
Comments:
<< Home
Hi Rod, fellow mobilian here, followed your advice on telescope purchase and con'd the spouse into getting me a fine Christmas gift. My first real telescope showed me a pretty view of m42 last night from midtown. Looking forward to finding clear skies, thanks for all the knowledge you've shared and keep up the good work!
Happy Holidays to you and yours, we appreciate your articles and insights and look forward to seeing them continue, Howard
Post a Comment
<< Home
