Sunday, January 22, 2017
Issue #527: The New Stellarium
I don’t claim to be some kind of software guru, but I have
been using astronomy software since computers first came to our avocation. Most of you know that, and I am often asked which
software I use. Those asking are sometimes disappointed when I say, “Whatever
is cheap and simple” rather than “The latest version of TheSky X Professional (or
Maxim DL).” In part, that’s because I am
cheap. And it’s also in part because the things I do in astronomy today are
simple enough that they could probably be accomplished with a 20-year-old copy
of Megastar.
Just because I don’t spend a lot/any money on the software
than runs on my PCs (no Mac here despite my not infrequent threats to go Apple)
doesn’t mean my astronomy programs aren’t capable of doing far more than I do
with them. We are in a golden age of incredibly capable astronomy freeware with
softs like Cartes du Ciel, Deep Sky Stacker, Sharpcap, Astrotortilla,
Auto Stakkert, ASCOM, Registax, and,
the subject of today’s article, Stellarium.
Yes, there are tons of excellent planetarium programs,
freeware and payware planetarium programs, beyond the above mentioned Cartes (a
long time favorite of mine and a wonderful piece of software) and TheSky X, but
what I use more than anything else today is Stellarium. Why? It’s simple and
it’s pretty and that is exactly what I appreciate at the moment. It also does
everything I need, and could do far more than I ask it to. If you’re interested
in the basics of Stellarium, including how to install and configure it, see this article (from over five years ago, hard as that is for me to believe). Today, we’ll mostly be looking at what’s
new in the latest release, Stellarium 15.1.1.
To make the above-linked long story short, Stellarium, in
addition to being free, is a relatively quick download, and while, like any
astronomy software, it needs to be configured, it’s not that tough. For the
most part, there are no submenus of submenus of submenus. You get some fairly
clear choices in a few (multi-tabbed, admittedly) windows, “Location,” “Sky and
Viewing Options,” and “Configuration.” It’s all easy to do and it’s fairly
obvious what you should do without
even looking at help pages.
 |
| Without (top) and with (bottom) DSS (click to enlarge)... |
Even setting up a connection to a telescope is not that bad.
It’s duck soup if you can use the program’s built in telescope drivers
(Celestron, Meade, Losmandy, SkyWatcher, Argo Navis). If you have a non-compatible
telescope, you’ll have to use an add-on helper program, StellariumScope to give
the program access to the multitudinous ASCOM telescope drivers, but even doing
that is fairly simple.
How much computing horsepower does it take to run
Stellarium? For the current version you’ll want a reasonably fast processor, but
a 2.4 gig one like those in even the cheapest boxes from BestBuy is more than
sufficient. Most important is a video card that supports the Open GL graphics system. You’ll also want Windows 7 and up, OSX and up, or a reasonably current
flavor of Linux/Unix as your operating system. You can download older versions of Stellarium to
accommodate older OSes and video cards, but you really don’t want to.
What is the first thing you will notice the first time you
boot up Stellarium? Just how beautiful it is. This software is used in
conjunction with projectors in planetariums, and it’s easy to see why. Its sky
is as realistic as those in the most expensive apps. Weather, fog, passing
satellites (actual satellites), sporadic meteors, beautiful horizon scenery,
and a luscious looking sky with a superb rendition of the Milky Way are all
there. You can download plenty of additional stars, and the program contains
thousands and thousands and thousands of deep sky objects. Movement around the sky, dragging
it with a mouse, is wonderfully responsive.
But those of you who’ve, like me, been using the program for
a while know all that. What you want to know is, “Why should I go to the
trouble of downloading the new one and going through that configurating again?
Here’s a (partial) list of what’s new from the program’s
website:
- The Digital Sky Survey (DSS) can
be shown (requires online connection).
- AstroCalc is now available from
the main menu and gives interesting new computational insight.
-A lot of bugs have been fixed.
- Added support of time zones
dependent by location.
- Added new skyculture: Sardinian.
- Added updates and improvements in
catalogs.
- Added improvements in the GUI.
- Added cross identification data
for stars from Bright Star Catalogue, 5th Revised Ed.
That first thing, DSS, is the money here. Being able to
download and overlay Digitized Sky Survey images on Stellarium is a wonderful
tool. Sure, you need an Internet connection, but it’s getting to the point
where many star parties provide that. Not only are the charts prettier with DSS,
they are more detailed. Compare the program’s normal display of M33, the
Triangulum Galaxy, to one showing the DSS image of M33 (above). What’s really cool
about this feature? Plenty of planetarium programs allow you to superimpose DSS
images over their charts, but most require you to be zoomed in tight. Not
Stellarium. The image at the beginning of this post is 30-degrees of Cygnus with DSS “on.”
 |
| Astrocalc... |
While the program’s developers warn the Digitized Sky
Survey feature is still somewhat experimental, it worked flawlessly for me.
Occasionally, when using wide fields of view, there were a few “stitching”
artifacts, but these didn’t bother me or cause problems. DSS is reason enough
to upgrade to the new Stellarium. The current release is 15.1.1, btw, because
the initial 15.1 build had problems with missing dlls, which prevented you from
downloading the additional star catalogs offered for the program.
“Astrocalc” is Stellarium’s text-based ephemeris module. You
can now overlay it on the screen with a push of the F10 button. In addition to
ephemerides, this tabbed window will give positions for comets (clicking on a
comet in the list will center it on the chart), find conjunctions, and display
a graph showing altitude versus time for the selected object. That last is
similar to the observability graphs offered in several other programs, and it
is a very popular and useful tool for me.
The other additions, like a new “sky culture” (constellation
system), are more minor, but still welcome, and undoubtedly useful to some of
the program’s large base of users. As above, Stellarium is used by more than a few planetariums
and science museums. More important to most of us, I suppose, are the updates
and expansions to the program’s deep sky and star catalogs.
There’s always that ever-popular question among deep sky
hounds, “How many DSOs does it got?” I don’t know that there’s a numerical
total anywhere on the Stellarium website, but the DSO catalog has undoubtedly
grown with the last couple of releases. For example, zooming in on a field in
Coma revealed plenty of magnitude 16 PGC galaxies. I am more interested in
imaging and observing the bright and spectacular galaxies, clusters, and
nebulae these days (I used to chase
Arps, PGCs, and UGCs), but if I were currently interested in the dimmest of the
dim, I’d still be just fine with Stellarium.
What’s the experience of using the program like for those
who haven’t tried it yet? Most people tend to think of this as a very visual, GUI oriented program, and it
can be that. Grab the sky and drag it around, use the roller ball on your mouse to
zoom. It’s a silky smooth and, yeah, visual
experience. Strangely, however, one of Stellarium’s major strengths hearkens
back to the earliest days of computing. What it’s very strong with is hot keys.
Yes, it’s cools to mouse over to the left side of the screen
(which makes one of the program’s tool-icon-menus appear), click that pretty “find”
icon, and locate what you want with the aid of the window that comes up. Cool,
yeah, but somewhat annoying out on a dark observing field. Much easier/simpler is pressing F3, which summons that same window without mousing around and clicking.
Much of what you need to do with the program can be done quickly with F keys
and key combos. , for example, takes you do the eastern horizon
post-haste.
 |
| It's just so pretty! |
The ability to do things quickly with hot-key combos doesn’t
end with the things built into the program by the developer. Stellarium
includes a powerful scripting system that will allow you to compose scripts to
do things with a few key presses, things as simple as pointing at a
certain object, or as complex as taking you on a tour of the best NGC objects.
How do I use Stellarium? Basically, in three ways. First, I
use it to give me quick “What’s up?” looks at the sky. You know, “What’s high
in the east right now?” After Windows changed enough that that DOS oldie but
goodie, Skyglobe, would no longer run, I cast about for a program that was quick
to load and would let me get to my chosen horizon in a hurry. Initially, I used
the free soft I got with my Edge800/VX telescope four years ago, the lowest level
of Bisque’s TheSky X, the First Light Edition. That’s a nice but very limited
program (natch), so I was pleased to be able to ditch it for the recent
releases of Stellarium, which load quickly on my modern PCs, and which offer
those quick hot-keys to allow me to get to anything and anywhere.
Secondly, I use Stellarium when writing observing articles,
whether for this blog or for Sky &
Telescope. The program has an excellent measuring tool that allows me to
easily determine that NGC Umptysquat is 3 degrees northwest of M Whatsit.
Finally, I use Stellarium in the field with my telescope.
While there are built-in drivers for all my mounts, I generally use the
SteallariumScope program and ASCOM drivers, since ASCOM gives me some things
the built-in drivers don’t, like a little onscreen hand control. That allows me
to center objects I am imaging without messing with the real HC (and prevents
my editor from complaining about my poorly centered/composed astrophotos). Going to objects with Stellarium is a breeze,
by the way. Select an object, hold down the CTRL key and press “1.” That’s all.
No icons to hunt or menus to navigate.
In the field, I often use Stellarium alongside a planner/logger—SkyTools,
Deep Sky Planner, or Deepsky. While you can’t interface Stellarium with Deep
Sky Planner as you can some other planetarium programs, I don’t find that a huge
problem. I locate an object in DSP’s database, switch to Stellarium, hit the F3
key, and type in the object identifier, Not a big deal. And then I just do my
thing with Stellarium and my telescope. I have never had any problems with or program
crashes in the field. Yes, computers can be cantankerous, but Stellarium is exemplary for its good behavior.
And there you have it. If you are a Stellarium user, you’ll
want to upgrade ASAP in order to get the DSS feature. Not a Stellarium user? As
I said earlier, there are many great free planetariums these days, like Cartes
and Hallo Northern Sky, but since there’s no money involved, why not give
Stellarium a try; you just might like its way of doing things. You are firmly
in the TheSky X or Starry Night camp? Again, it don’t cost nuthin’ so why not
try Stellarium? There’s a lot to be said for “simpler.” Me? I’m allergic to
menus within menus within menus, and that’s one of the reasons I’ll be rolling
with Stellarium for a while, I think.
Comments:
<< Home
Yes, DSS is the one for the money! The important thing about DSS images is that they are real photographs. They are not influenced by errors in catalogues. Of course, they may show asteroids or plate defects, but they are usually the best way to confirm what's really there.
The ALADIN app (from the Simbad people) is also free and gives you access to DSS images.
The ALADIN app (from the Simbad people) is also free and gives you access to DSS images.
# posted by 
: 9:29 AM
: 9:29 AM
To me stellarium has always been good!
Thanks for the Update.
You might want to keep the "cheap ball" rolling and review stacking (registration and imaging software.
You can get the job done for free!
I'm a big fan of PIPP and the old standby Registax which has a pretty big learning curve
and Adobe Photoshop Express.
But I'm always looking for better.
MIke Boyle
Thanks for the Update.
You might want to keep the "cheap ball" rolling and review stacking (registration and imaging software.
You can get the job done for free!
I'm a big fan of PIPP and the old standby Registax which has a pretty big learning curve
and Adobe Photoshop Express.
But I'm always looking for better.
MIke Boyle
# posted by : 11:52 AM
: 11:52 AM
One thing that I have done is to create a background based on my actual observing location in my back field. I have trees in different directions as well as a hill in the east so I can quickly determine when objects will be clear of these obstructions.
Another great feature that I use a lot is the ocular plug-in. By adding telescopes, eyepieces, cameras, barlows, focal reducers, etc. it is very easy to see how things will look in the eyepiece or how it will fit on your camera's sensor.
There are a few minor things that I don't like but overall the pluses far outweigh the minuses. In fact this is one of the very few programs that I have made contributions to. It is well worth $5, $10 or $20 contribution.
One final note, there is a mobile version. Is it based on the PC version. It does cost a fee dollars ($2.49) and it is not as fully featured as the PC version but it is a great supplement when the only thing you have is your smartphone.
Another great feature that I use a lot is the ocular plug-in. By adding telescopes, eyepieces, cameras, barlows, focal reducers, etc. it is very easy to see how things will look in the eyepiece or how it will fit on your camera's sensor.
There are a few minor things that I don't like but overall the pluses far outweigh the minuses. In fact this is one of the very few programs that I have made contributions to. It is well worth $5, $10 or $20 contribution.
One final note, there is a mobile version. Is it based on the PC version. It does cost a fee dollars ($2.49) and it is not as fully featured as the PC version but it is a great supplement when the only thing you have is your smartphone.
# posted by : 4:54 PM
: 4:54 PM 
TheSbanker31 I'm so sorry I missed this question. I should have posted this link in my original comments. I'm sure there are a couple other ways this can be done. I google search should give you more information. There are some cameras that can shoot a panorama in a video mode (think some of the Sony's can do it) which would certainly make capturing a 360 panorama view a lot easier. Here is a FB album documenting how I did mine. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10151630838421358.1073741834.587966357&type=1&l=a8b640824c
# posted by : 9:56 AM
: 9:56 AM
Thanks for the idea to create a customized background. I'm not much of a technophile, but I think I'll have to carve out some time and experiment with trying to customize view with the app. Thanks again... Happy Gazing!
Post a Comment
<< Home
