Sunday, September 18, 2016
Issue #509, The Messier XII: Steady as She Goes
M83 |
You know
what I’d like to do? Actually look at some Messier objects instead of
just talk about them. I was hoping
I’d get in some time with my 10-inch Dobbie, Zelda, and my 5-inch refractor,
Hermione, now that I am off the road for a while, but guess what? As if a big Moon
weren’t enough, the weather gods have decreed almost constant clouds for moi. Well, at least I have my memories
of this set objects, which includes outstanding ones even by Messier
standards. OK, into the backyard we go...
M78
M78 is not
one of the more difficult Messiers, but neither is it trivial. Reflection
nebulae never are. These clouds of gas are not excited to glow; they don’t emit
light on their own. They are mostly composed of dust with a consistency
approaching that of cigarette smoke, and shine only by the reflected light of the
stars within them or nearby. That’s why, when you think reflection nebulae, you
thing hot young O-B stars. It takes
a lot of power to light up dark clouds, even dimly, and hot stars like those in
the Pleiades are just the ticket. Compared to emission nebulae, reflection
nebulae are subdued, with the Merope nebula that enwraps the Pleiads being
aptly compared to “baby’s breath on a mirror.”
M78
certainly ain’t as hard as the Merope nebula, but it takes some considerable
telescopic hardware and dark skies if you want to see it as more than just an
oval glow. While it possesses an integrated magnitude of 8.0 and has a fairly
small size, the nebula can still be challenging from light pollution. I used to
struggle to pull it out of a bright background sky with my 4.25-inch Newtonian from one of the homes I lived in in the 1980s, which was nearly as far downtown
as good old Chaos Manor South.
One good
thing is that M78 is easy to find by star hopping, and was, in fact, one of the
first objects I located that way back in the 1960s. M78 forms a near 90-degree
triangle with the three bright stars of Orion’s belt, and is located 2-degrees
38’ northeast of Alnitak (Zeta Orionis). When you think you are in the correct position,
scan around with a medium power eyepiece. What you are looking for is a
magnitude 10 range double star with a separation of about 2.0’. Examine this
pair carefully, and if your skies are not too
icky, you will see it is surrounded by an oval glow.
And that is
about all you will see even with larger scopes from light polluted skies. Get
to the dark spaces, however, and even a 4-inch will begin to show some details,
brighter and darker regions, and the oval will assume a somewhat irregular
shape. You should be able to detect at least 3 – 4’ of nebulosity. Up the
aperture and/or improve the skies further and you will begin to see that the
nebula is fan shaped. 10-inch and larger scopes will also reveal this little
knot is just one part of a large complex of nebulosity with other dimmer but
similar patches coming into view.
I’ve often
read that light pollution reduction filters do not work on M78, since it is a
reflection nebulosity. The light of the stars, after all, is in the same band
of wavelengths as the artificial lights that LPR filters are designed to
attenuate. Actually, however, a UHC filter can improve the view of M78
somewhat, since it has a fairly large emission nebula component. One of the big
rules of amateur astronomy? Saying something is “impossible” is a sure way to
be proven wrong.
M79
The sky of
winter isn’t entirely bereft of globular star clusters, but it might as well
be. Once M15 and M30 and M2 sink below the horizon, you are pretty much left with M79,
and the ground truth is that it just isn’t much of a glob. At magnitude 8.56
and with a size of 9’36”, it is on the puny side, and its declination,
-24-degrees 30’, means it is a trifle low for more than a few Northern
Hemisphere observers. Still, it is the only Messier glob game in town for a
while, so let’s get after it.
Finding is
not terribly involved if your southern horizon is mostly unobstructed. M79’s
home constellation, the little hare, Lepus, crouching at the feet of Orion is
easy enough to make out in the suburban backyard. Naturally, however, as is
usual with constellations, it doesn’t look a thing like what it is supposed to
represent. That’s wight, wabbit,
this bunny looks more like a capital letter “I” (as in “India”). The glob
itself forms a near equilateral triangle with Epsilon Leporus and Beta Leporis,
and should show up in 4-inchers without a fuss, albeit just as a small, subdued
round glow.
Its Shapley –
Sawyer class of V means M79 is almost right in the middle as far as
concentration goes. Not too compressed, not too loose. That does not mean it is
easy to resolve in the backyard, however. Often an 8-inch SCT won’t quite do
the job, even at high power. Oh, you might get a few stars in the periphery
winking in and out, but convincing resolution at home requires my 10-inch
Dobsonian, Zelda. Naturally, it’s easier at a dark site, and in 12-inch and
larger scopes under good skies, M79 almost begins to look worthy of its Messier
designation.
M79 is better than some of the puny
globulars of Sagittarius, but not as good as Coma’s M53. Still, its solo
status in the winter means it will give you some chucks during otherwise glob-free
times.
M80
If M79 is
not exactly highly concentrated, M80 is very highly concentrated, being rated a
II on the 12 step Shapley-Sawyer scale. That brings good and bad. Combined with
its bright magnitude, 7.87, and its relatively small size, 10.0’, this glob
stands out like a sore thumb even with Scorpius is low in the sky. But its
compact nature also makes it something of a bear to resolve.
The cluster
is easily located by searching the area 4-degrees, 28’ northwest of bright
Alpha Scorpii, Antares. Be careful, however. Since it is small and compact, M80 can most assuredly masquerade as a
bloated star at low magnifications in smaller scopes. Use medium power, 100x
and up, and examine each field carefully, however, and you will be rewarded.
What exactly
will your reward be? That depends on your magnification and the aperture of
your telescope. In a 4-inch or smaller instrument, the cluster will be easy,
but even at higher magnifications it will not be resolved. What it will look a
lot like is a bright elliptical galaxy, with a brighter middle and a diffuse
halo.
Alas, an
8-inch or even a 10-inch in a suburban yard won’t deliver much more than the
above, with an 8-inch sometimes failing to resolve any stars at all unless the
conditions are good—the cluster is near culmination on a dry, transparent
night. A 10-inch is better. On an average suburban night, one will show the
cluster as a grainy appearing ball, and upping the power will bring home a
sparkler or two. Even at a dark site, however, I find a 12-inch is required for
a truly outstanding view of this tough-nut globular.
M81
The galaxy
pair of M81 and M82 isn’t just good, it’s one of the outstanding destinations
in the list, right up there with the likes of M42 and M13. How can it be
otherwise? Here, you’ve got two bright galaxies, magnitude 6.94 M81 and
magnitude 8.41 M82 separated by just a bit more than half a degree. Not only
can you fit them both in the same field using a wide-field eyepiece, even with
fairly large aperture scopes, they are both potentially detailed and worthy of
much inspection.
M81 and M82 |
M81 first.
How to find? I’ll tell you how I was taught to locate Bode’s Nebula (M81) many
a Moon ago when I was the greenest of greenhorn novices. Start at the Big
Dipper’s bowl star, Phad. Draw a 10-degree long diagonal line from Phad to Dubhe and on for
another 10-degrees. That will put you right in the area of M81/82. If you land
on M82 first—it stands out better than M81—just move 36’ south. Really, it’s
like shooting fish in the proverbial barrel. How will you know when you are on
M81? You’ll see a bright enough oval “nebula.”
Here’s the
thing about M81, y’all: while it is a
beautiful sight, in the suburbs its beauty is mostly due to its association
with M81. While the central portion of this intermediate inclination galaxy is
“bright,” the outer disk and spiral arms are quite subdued. It’s large, almost
27’ across, so the light is badly spread out. The only decent looks I’ve had of
this Sab spiral’s arms, which are like wisps of gossamer, have been from dark
sites with larger apertures. From a truly superior site, a 12-inch will reveal
them easily, as my 12-inch, Old Betsy, did one memorable night in the 1990s at
the Texas Star Party. At less good locations, you’ll want at least 16-inches
of aperture for a good look.
Under
average conditions at average dark sites with a medium-sized telescope, you’ll
likely see about what I saw with my C11, Big Bertha, back in May of 2004 from
the old Georgia Sky View Star Party at Indian Springs State Park.
Under hazy conditions, M 81 is still
bright and attractive. Stellar appearing nucleus in TeleVue Panoptic 22mm
at 127x. Considerable oval haze extends
out from the central regions n/s. No hint of the very subtle spiral arms
tonight. Much the same in the 12mm TeleVue Nagler at 233x, though the nucleus
looks smaller at this higher power when the seeing settles.
M82
M82,
conversely, gives up detail to 6-inch telescopes in suburban backyards. It’s
bright, nearly edge-on, and there are plenty of details to be seen in the Cigar
Galaxy, which my daughter, Lizbeth, used to call the Exploding Cigar Galaxy. It is "Exploding" because it’s disturbed, likely from a long-ago
interaction with M81, and is criss-crossed by dark lanes and festooned with
bright patches. The more aperture you use on this 9.3’ long galaxy, the more
you’ll see. Don’t be afraid to pump up the power, either. Under good
conditions, 200x is nice for the Cigar with an 8-incher.
On the same
night I viewed M81 in Georgia, I also recorded M82:
M82 in the TeleVue Nagler Type 2 12mm
at 233x is amazing. Bright star in the field, about 30" from the galaxy.
Dust lanes cross the galaxy’s thin disk (about 4’) and divide it into three
distinct sections.
Some of the
best views I’ve had of M82 have admittedly not been visual ones. With my Mallincam
Xtreme video camera and the C11, the galaxy is just incredible, showing not
just intricate dark lane structure, but almost psychedelic red matter
being emitted from the galaxy’s center. Amazing.
M83
M83, the
Southern Pinwheel, can be a pain. Mostly for Northern Hemisphere observers at
higher latitudes given the galaxy’s far southern declination, as things go in
the north, of almost 30-degrees south. If it gets even barely out of the muck
for you, however, this object is a real winner. It’s a classic barred spiral,
and the best description of it I’ve ever read came in Timothy Ferris’ wonderful
coffee-table book Galaxies
(recommended), where he describes it as being “alive with motion.”
How do you
locate this magnitude 7.8, 14.1’ galaxy among the southern stars of Hydra? If M83
is low in the sky for you, DSCs or goto will make your task easier, but it is
really not difficult to pin down with star chart and finder scope. It lies
about halfway along a line drawn between Menkent (Theta Centauri; I told you
this was a southern object) and Gamma Hydrae. M83 is prominent enough that you
should pick it up easily in a medium powered wide-field eyepiece without
further direction.
In the
eyepiece? To me, the Southern Pinwheel always looks somewhat like a smaller M33
at first glance. As you continue to look, however, you’ll notice it looks round
rather than oval like the Triangulum galaxy. The next thing you should see is
the strong bar. If you continue, especially with an ultra-wide medium power
ocular (I used to like my old 12mm Nagler Type II on it), you’ll begin to make
out details starting with the prominent central bar and moving on to HII
regions and the wheeling spiral arms. How hard is the spiral structure to
detect? Not hard at all if the object is decently high in the sky for you at a
half-way good site, as at my club dark site one late May evening with my
ETX-125, Charity Hope Valentine:
M83, a magnitude 7.8, 14.1'x13.2'
spiral, has a dramatically bright stellar core and a large, mostly round outer
envelope. Spiral structure pops in and out of view. I do have to be careful not
to “see” what I expect to see given the images I’ve seen and looks I have had
of the object in larger scopes, but the arms are just not that difficult. The
galaxy's bar is easy.
M83 is
another wonderful target for a deep sky video camera, and shows amazing detail
and color in the Xtreme, and also in my inexpensive Revolution vidcam.
M84
M84 |
M84 is that
most common of Virgo beasties, a bright, round elliptical galaxy. Oh, this
object’s field makes for a great view, but not because of M84 itself. It’s
brilliant (for a galaxy) at magnitude 10.1 and only 6.3’ across, but, as is
usually the case with ellipticals, there’s just not a lot to see—a bright round
fuzzball that looks like a small, unresolved globular star cluster.
If goto can
make finding M83 more pleasant, it can make finding M84 much more pleasant. There are so many bright galaxies within the
arms of Virgo that it’s hard to know which one you are on. Luckily, the field
here is pretty distinctive. If you simply must find 84 the old fashioned way,
it lies halfway along a line drawn between Epsilon Virginis, Vendemiatrix, and
Denebola, Beta Leonis. Positoned there, look for two bright fuzzballs about 17’
apart. Which is M84? It is the southwestern fuzzball. It is also rounder-looking
than the other galaxy, M86. M84 is a Hubble Type E1, while M86 is an E3.
What just
tickles me about this field? You’ve heard of The Eyes, two bright galaxies just
to the east of M84/86? Well, M84 and M86 to me are “The Face.” The two big
galaxies are the eyes, a small elliptical, NGC 4387, is the nose, and an
edge-on, NGC 4388 is the mouth. The effect is so comical that I can’t help
smiling every time I land on this field. Which is also beautiful, of course,
because it is part of Markarian’s Chain, the line of bright galaxies stretching
off to the east. A look at this area with an 18 – 20-inch telescope from a dark
site is a mind-blower, and has almost
impelled me to buy a really large Dobsonian a time or two.
And that
does it for another M batch. Next up? I’m not sure, but it certainly doesn’t
look like I’ll be doing any observing any time soon. The weather this time of year on the Gulf Coast
simply doesn’t encourage that. Oh, things will improve as they always do, but not
until late October usually. Until then? We may take a break from the Ms for a
week or three and talk about another favorite observing list of mine.
Comments:
<< Home
Hi Rod,
Thanks for another nice blog. I've noted the 125 ETX is back again, hopefully the new ones prove to be nice units like yours.
John O'Hara
Oil City, PA
Post a Comment
Thanks for another nice blog. I've noted the 125 ETX is back again, hopefully the new ones prove to be nice units like yours.
John O'Hara
Oil City, PA
<< Home